ArticleBMJ open2025
Knowledge, attitude and use of menstrual cup among females of Siddharthanagar Municipality, Nepal: a community-based cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAlthough menstrual cups have a long history and numerous benefits, many women of reproductive age remain unaware. This study assessed the knowledge, attitude and use regarding menstrual cups and its associated factors among females of reproductive age in Siddharthanagar Municipality, Lumbini Province, Nepal.
designCross-sectional study
settingSiddharthanagar municipality, Rupandehi was taken as the study setting. PARTICIPANT: A total of 250 women of reproductive age group (15-49 years) residing in Siddharthanagar Municipality. OUTCOME MEASURE: Knowledge, attitude and use of menstrual cups were assessed by a pretested structured tool. The knowledge scores for each question were given as one mark for a correct response, and the overall scores were categorised using a modified Bloom's cut-off as follows: good knowledge≥60% and poor knowledge<60%. Attitudes scores were grouped into three categories: favourable (>80%), neutral (60%-80%) and unfavourable (<60%). Practice was assessed by a single question whether they use a menstrual cup. Pearson's χ
resultsThis study found that the majority (88.04%) had poor knowledge about the menstrual cup, with 31.2% of participants expressing a favourable attitude. Only 10.6% of participants had used a menstrual cup. The odds of adequate knowledge among the participants with bachelor and higher level of education was 3.470 times (adjusted OR (aOR)=3.470, 95% CI 1.08 to 11.10) as compared with participants with secondary or lower level of education, adjusting for other explanatory variables. The odds of having adequate knowledge among participants who were employed was 1.66 times (aOR=1.66, 95% CI 1.24 to 5.83) compared with those who were unemployed, which was 2.487 times (aOR=2.487, 95% CI 1.24 to 7.95) in case of favourable attitude. Similarly, the odds of using a menstrual cup among the participants with an adequate level of knowledge was 7.960 times (aOR=7.960, 95% CI 2.70 to 23.40) as compared with participants who had an inadequate level of knowledge, adjusting for other explanatory variables.
conclusionOur study revealed that, despite their advantages, participants have limited knowledge and usage of menstrual cups. This highlights the need for advocacy and education about menstrual cups to enable informed choices, enhance women's quality of life and protect the environment by reducing waste from disposable menstrual products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.