Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41469060›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2025

Can vocational advice be delivered in primary care? The Work And Vocational advicE (WAVE) mixed method single arm feasibility study.

Gwenllian Wynne-Jones, Gail Sowden, Ira Madan, Karen Walker-Bone, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Benjamin Saunders, Martyn Lewis, Kieran Bromley, Sue Jowett, Vaughan Parsons and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04543097 (Work And Vocational advicE), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04543097 naterminatednot on this map

Work And Vocational advicE (WAVE) in Primary Care: a Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKeele UniversityRan2020 to 2025Enrolled130ConditionsMusculoskeletal Pain, Mental Health Issue, Mental Health Disorder, Other Physical Health ConditionArmsVocational Support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Gwenllian Wynne-JonesSchool of Medicine, Keele University Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Keele, UK g.wynne-jones@keele.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0283-6632
Gail SowdenConnect Health Group Limited, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ira MadanOccupational Health, Safety and Wellbeing Service, Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2200-7329
Karen Walker-BoneMonash Centre for Occupational & Environmental Health, Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5992-1459
Carolyn Chew-GrahamSchool of Medicine, Keele University Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Keele, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9722-9981
Benjamin SaundersSchool of Medicine, Keele University Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Keele, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0856-1596
Martyn LewisSchool of Medicine, Keele University Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Keele, UK.
Kieran BromleyClinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.
Sue JowettHealth Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Vaughan ParsonsOccupational Health, Safety and Wellbeing Service, Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0523-3770
Gemma MansellSchool of Psychology, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5479-2678
Kendra CookeClinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.
Sarah A LawtonClinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8909-2057
Catherine LinakerMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre and Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
John PembertonResearch User Group, Impact Accelerator Unit, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.
Cyrus CooperMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton and Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Nadine E FosterSTARS Education and Research Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMost patients with health conditions necessitating time off work consult in primary care. Offering vocational advice (VA) early within this setting may help them to return to work and reduce sickness absence. Previous research shows the benefits of VA interventions for musculoskeletal pain in primary care, but an intervention for a much broader primary care patient population has yet to be tested. The Work And Vocational advicE feasibility study tested patient identification and recruitment methods, explored participants' experiences of being invited to the study and their experiences of receiving VA.

designA mixed method, single arm feasibility study comprising both quantitative and qualitative analysis of recruitment and participation in the study.

settingPrimary care.

methodsThe study included participant follow-up by fortnightly Short Message Service text and 6-week questionnaire. Stop/go criteria focus on recruitment and intervention engagement. The semistructured interviews explored participants' experiences of recruitment and receipt and engagement with the intervention.

results19 participants were recruited (4.3% response rate). Identification of participants via retrospective fit-note searches was reasonably successful (13/19 (68%) identified), recruitment stop/go criteria were met with ≥50% of those eligible and expressing an interest recruited. The stop/go criterion for intervention engagement was met with 16/19 (86%) participants having at least one contact with a vocational support worker. Five participants were interviewed; they reported positive experiences of recruitment and felt the VA intervention was acceptable.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that delivering VA in primary care is feasible and acceptable. To ensure a future trial is feasible, recruitment strategies and data collection methods require additional refinement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04543097.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal PainPrimary Health CareReturn to WorkVocational GuidanceAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionSurveys and QuestionnairesFeasibility StudiesOccupational Health ServicesPrimary CarePsychosocial Intervention

Identifiers

PMID41469060
PMCPMC12750802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.