ArticleBMJ open2025
Impact of COVID-19-induced psychological distress on sexual quality of life and care delivery among healthcare workers: a scoping review protocol of global evidence.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCOVID-19 pandemic affected physical, psychological and social well-being of many individuals, including healthcare workers, who were at the forefront of the pandemic. Thus, the pandemic may have reduced the sexual quality of life of frontline healthcare workers, which in turn could compromise their ability to provide quality healthcare to patients. This scoping review aims to gather and synthesise current available global evidence on the interactions among COVID-19, sexual quality of life and healthcare delivery among healthcare workers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The JBI framework for performing scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guided the conduct of this scoping review. A search strategy was developed and will be implemented in five major databases, including PubMed, SCOPUS, JSTOR, Dimensions AI and CENTRAL. Additional records will be obtained via Google, Google Scholar, WHO IRIS, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, as well as reference lists of selected full-text studies, ending in January 2026. Eligible studies will include original peer-reviewed articles conducted among healthcare workers that examine how COVID-19 affected their sexual health and how this, in turn, influenced their healthcare delivery. The data will be extracted and charted using predetermined criteria to completely understand the relationship between COVID-19-induced psychological distress and sexual health among healthcare workers. Using a narrative synthesis and thematic analysis, the findings from the selected studies will then be summarised and synthesised. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Since primary data would not be collected for this study, ethical approval will not be needed. The study's findings will be derived from publicly accessible documents and previously published articles. The findings of the review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences and workshops. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The scoping review protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/2yjkx).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.