Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41468989›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Calculation of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure including left atrial function is superior to morphology alone and accurately identifies elevated filling pressures in left heart disease.

Sören J Backhaus, Ben N Schmermund, Andreas J Rieth, Matthias Rademann, Steffen D Kriechbaum, Jan Sebastian Wolter, Christoph B Wiedenroth, Alexander Schulz, Torben Lange, Julia M Treiber and 3 more

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sören J BackhausDepartment of Cardiology, Campus Kerckhoff of the Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany; Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Giessen/Bad Nauheim, Germany; Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Clinic I, University Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany. Electronic address: soeren.backhaus@outlook.de.
Ben N SchmermundDepartment of Cardiology, Campus Kerckhoff of the Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany; Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Giessen/Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Andreas J RiethDepartment of Cardiology, Campus Kerckhoff of the Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany; Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Giessen/Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Matthias RademannDepartment of Cardiology, Campus Kerckhoff of the Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany; Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Giessen/Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Steffen D KriechbaumDepartment of Cardiology, Campus Kerckhoff of the Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany; Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Giessen/Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Jan Sebastian WolterDepartment of Cardiology, Campus Kerckhoff of the Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany; Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Giessen/Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Christoph B WiedenrothDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Campus Kerckhoff of the Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Kerckhoff-Clinic, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Alexander SchulzUniversity Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Lower Saxony, Göttingen, Germany; Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Torben LangeUniversity Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Lower Saxony, Göttingen, Germany.
Julia M TreiberDepartment of Cardiology, Campus Kerckhoff of the Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany; Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Giessen/Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Samuel SossallaDepartment of Cardiology, Campus Kerckhoff of the Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany; Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Giessen/Bad Nauheim, Germany; Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Clinic I, University Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Andreas SchusterUniversity Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Lower Saxony, Göttingen, Germany; FORUM Cardiology, Rosdorf, Germany.
Andreas RolfDepartment of Cardiology, Campus Kerckhoff of the Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany; Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Giessen/Bad Nauheim, Germany; Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Clinic I, University Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRight heart catheterization (RHC) with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) assessment is the reference standard for diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but remains largely underused. Different approaches for non-invasive PCWP calculation have been proposed. However, as left atrial strain (LA Es) and end-systolic volume index (ESVi) emerge as key criteria in HFpEF, we sought to investigate them for PCWP calculation.

methodsThe derivation population consisted of patients referred to RHC and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging who were enrolled in a prospective monocentric registry. Patients were classified by RHC according to current guideline recommendations. The external validation population consisted of patients included in the HFpEF-Stress trial who underwent exercise-stress RHC and CMR with follow-up after 4 years for hospitalized cardiovascular events. Performance of strain-derived PCWP was compared to a published LA volume (LAV) and left ventricular mass (LVM) derived method.

resultsThe derivation population consisted of n = 209 patients, n = 123 underwent exercise-stress RHC (n = 55 without pulmonary hypertension [PH], n = 72 pre-capillary, n = 27 combined post- and pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension [CpcPH], n = 15 isolated post-capillary pulmonary hypertension [IpcPH], n = 34 exercise, and n = 6 unclassified PH). Linear regression models identified the following formulae for functional PCWPrest 10.304 - 0.095 * Es + 0.098 * ESVi and functional PCWPstress 24.666 - 0.251 * Es + 0.056 * ESVi calculation. The validation population consisted of n = 74 patients (n = 15 without, n = 5 pre-capillary, n = 8 CpcPH, n = 10 IpcPH, and n = 32 exercise PH with n = 4 remaining unclassified). Functional PCWPrest (11.8) and RHC-derived PCWPrest (11 mmHg) were statistically similar (p = 0.285) and showed moderate correlation (r = 0.53, p < 0.001). Functional PCWPrest (area under the curve [AUC] 0.80) and PCWPstress (AUC 0.85) accurately identified HFpEF patients, were superior to LAV/LVM-based PCWP (AUC 0.67, p ≤ 0.002) and showed prognostic implications (hazard ratio 1.37 (1.16-1.62) and 1.29 (1.14-1.46), p < 0.001).

conclusionFunctional PCWP may aid in the identification of post-capillary involvement in PH and HFpEF superiorly compared to morphology-derived PCWP and shows prognostic implications.

Indexed as

Atrial Function, LeftCardiac CatheterizationHeart FailureMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CinePulmonary Wedge PressureVentricular Function, LeftVentricular PressureAgedExercise TestFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProspective StudiesAtrial strainHFpEFLeft heart involvementPCWPPulmonary hypertension

Identifiers

PMID41468989
PMCPMC13126477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.