Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41468898›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of perinatology2026

The Ethics of Clinical Research on Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn: Balancing Benefit-Risk, Autonomy, and Maternal-Fetal Interests.

Robert M Nelson, Karla Childers, Leona E Ling, Lori Alquier, Yosuke Komatsu, Lisa Schwartz, Anne M Stevens, May Lee Tjoa, Kenneth J Moise, Sara F Goldkind

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of perinatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Robert M NelsonPediatric Drug Development, Child Health Innovation Leadership Department, Johnson & Johnson, Raritan, New Jersey, United States.
Karla ChildersBioethics-Based Science and Technology Policy, Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States.
Leona E LingTranslational Science (Autoantibody), Johnson & Johnson, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States.
Lori AlquierGlobal Regulatory Affairs, Johnson & Johnson, Raritan, New Jersey, United States.
Yosuke KomatsuDepartment of Maternal Fetal Immunology, Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, Pennsylvania, United States.
Lisa SchwartzDepartment of Immunology, Johnson & Johnson, Raritan, New Jersey, United States.
Anne M StevensDepartment of Clinical Development, Century Therapeutics, Seattle, Washington, United States.
May Lee TjoaGlobal Medical Affairs, Johnson & Johnson, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States.
Kenneth J MoiseDepartment of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5028-8426
Sara F GoldkindGoldkind Consulting, LLC, Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Pregnant persons historically have been excluded from clinical trials. Recently, there has been a shift from exclusion toward inclusion of pregnant persons in research while acknowledging the complexity of reproductive ethics and the intertwined interests of the pregnant person and fetus. Our objective was to use a principle-based approach to review the ethics of clinical research concerning pregnancy-related disorders that predominantly affect fetal well-being. Study Design: Ethical principles are applied to the design of interventional trials in two rare conditions of pregnancy, hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) and fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT). Results: Severe HDFN and FNAIT are fetal and neonatal diseases caused by maternal alloantibodies with potential outcomes including maternal and neonatal morbidity, preterm delivery, and fetal or neonatal death. Early-onset severe HDFN was the initial indication for a phase 2 open-label study of nipocalimab in pregnancy, given poor outcomes after prior severe HDFN pregnancy(s). After establishing proof of concept, a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled study was initiated based on the ethical principles of equipoise and generating socially valuable data to support the efficacy and safety of nipocalimab in severe HDFN. However, off-label use of antenatal intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in standard-risk FNAIT pregnancies made a randomized placebo-controlled study challenging. Thus, the FNAIT clinical program for nipocalimab in pregnant persons with standard-risk FNAIT includes a randomized, placebo-controlled study limited to sites that do not use antenatal IVIg, and a global randomized open-label study of nipocalimab or IVIg. Conclusion: Knowledge of the clinical course and management of severe HDFN and FNAIT, the non-clinical and non-pregnant human clinical evidence, and input from physicians, patients, and health authorities permitted the design of clinical protocols that satisfy the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence in these rare and complex diseases. Key Points: · Ethical principles apply to pregnancy-related disorders affecting fetal well-being.. · Placebo-controlled randomized trials in HDFN are based on equipoise.. · FNAIT programs must account for the off-label use of IVIg..

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchErythroblastosis, FetalThrombocytopenia, Neonatal AlloimmuneFemaleHumansImmunoglobulins, IntravenousInfant, NewbornPregnancyImmunoglobulins, Intravenous

Identifiers

PMID41468898
PMCPMC13345696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.