ArticleChild abuse & neglect2026
Most important predictors of father-child contact in the U.S. child welfare system: A machine learning approach.
Article in Child abuse & neglect, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLittle attention has been paid to comprehensively understanding multisystem-level factors that promote father involvement in the context of the U.S. child welfare system. Using novel data science methods, such as machine learning, could further advance child welfare research on father involvement.
objectiveThe current exploratory study applied an ecological systems framework to national child welfare survey data and used random forest, a type of machine learning, to identify the most important predictors of father-child contact across multiple system levels (i.e., individual, family, neighborhood, child welfare systems). PARTICIPANTS AND SETTINGS: Data came from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Wellbeing-Third Cohort (N = 2380).
methodsRandom forest was used for variable importance analysis using 124 multisystem-level predictors.
resultsFathers' sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., race/ethnicity, education) were among the most important predictors of father-child contact, followed by caseworker characteristics (e.g., other language spoken), service referrals by the child welfare system (e.g., health, legal), family economic condition and composition (e.g., access to food, number of children), and child characteristics (e.g., sex).
conclusionsFactors at different system levels interact in complex ways to predict father-child contact. Child welfare researchers can consider machine learning as a complementary method to traditional statistics. Methodological advantages machine learning brings include enhancing predictive accuracy, handling large amounts of data, and modeling complex and non-linear relationships with numerous predictors. These advantages allow for uncovering new quantitative insights and patterns to advance child welfare research, practice, and policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.