Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41468686›Full record

Observational studyESMO open2026

A multi-centre performance evaluation of a commercially developed liquid biopsy for the earlier detection of brain tumours.

P M Brennan, J M Cameron, D Eustace, H J Butler, A Sala, A Lazarus, G Antoniou, D S Palmer, E Gray, C Kerrie and 24 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in ESMO open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

P M BrennanTranslational Neurosurgery, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Electronic address: Paul.Brennan@ed.ac.uk.
J M CameronDxcover Ltd, Royal College Building, Suite RC534, Glasgow, UK.
D EustaceDxcover Ltd, Royal College Building, Suite RC534, Glasgow, UK.
H J ButlerDxcover Ltd, Royal College Building, Suite RC534, Glasgow, UK.
A SalaDxcover Ltd, Royal College Building, Suite RC534, Glasgow, UK.
A LazarusDxcover Ltd, Royal College Building, Suite RC534, Glasgow, UK.
G AntoniouDxcover Ltd, Royal College Building, Suite RC534, Glasgow, UK.
D S PalmerDxcover Ltd, Royal College Building, Suite RC534, Glasgow, UK; Department of Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
E GrayFreelance Consultant, Edinburgh, UK.
C KerrieEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
S McDonaldEmergency Medicine Research Group of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
P BlackEmergency Medicine Research Group of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
S SherazTranslational Neurosurgery, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
I AdekoyaEmergency Medicine Research Group of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
A JakolaInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden; Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Gothenburg, Sweden.
A DenesInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.
M D JenkinsonThe Walton Centre, NHS Foundation Trust Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
J JonesThe Walton Centre, NHS Foundation Trust Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
S PenderedThe Walton Centre, NHS Foundation Trust Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
S KoljenovicDepartment of Pathology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.
K ZwaenepoelDepartment of Pathology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.
A SiebenDepartment of Pathology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.
M AhmedDepartment of Pathology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.
B FeyenDepartment of Pathology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.
R K MathewDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK; School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
C CoilsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
A IsmailSchool of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
I PhangLancashire Clinical Research Facility, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK.
A BrownLancashire Clinical Research Facility, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK.
S PatelLancashire Clinical Research Facility, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK.
T WeissKlinik für Neurologie, Universitätsspital Zürich (USZ), Zurich, Switzerland.
P W WestarpKlinik für Neurologie, Universitätsspital Zürich (USZ), Zurich, Switzerland.
A KoppKlinik für Neurologie, Universitätsspital Zürich (USZ), Zurich, Switzerland.
M J BakerDxcover Ltd, Royal College Building, Suite RC534, Glasgow, UK; School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Lancashire, Preston, UK. Electronic address: matthew.baker@dxcover.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelayed diagnosis of brain cancer leads to two-thirds of patients receiving a diagnosis only after presenting to the emergency department with more severe symptoms or neurological deficits. A simple, rapid, liquid biopsy implemented in primary care could enable more efficient triage of patients with non-specific symptoms potentially related to brain cancer, prioritising patients for urgent brain imaging, and accelerating diagnosis. PATIENTS AND

methodsPresented is the international, multi-centre, observational Early and tiMely detection of BRAin CancEr (EMBRACE) study. Patients were prospectively recruited across seven sites in Europe, from the United Kingdom, Belgium, Sweden and Switzerland. The target population consisted of patients with symptoms potentially associated with brain cancer. Blood serum samples were analysed by the Dxcover® Brain Cancer Liquid Biopsy Platform. Test performance was assessed by comparison of the liquid biopsy result to diagnostic imaging.

resultsTwo thousand five hundred and fifty-four patients were enrolled across the seven collection sites; 2324 were deemed eligible and taken forward for test assessment. There were 697 brain tumours in total, of which 395 were malignant, and 1627 non-tumour diagnoses. Overall diagnostic performance for the primary objective was 86% sensitivity for brain cancer detection with 99% negative predictive value (NPV). Sensitivity for all brain tumours combined (malignant and benign) was 77%. Notably, for the most prevalent and most aggressive brain cancer, glioblastoma, 86% of cases were successfully identified. Additionally, 94% of patients with central nervous system lymphoma, and 90% of brain metastases were predicted correctly as having tumours.

conclusionsExisting symptom-based referral pathways are ineffective for the detection of brain cancer, and there is an urgent need for new tests to help with clinical decision making. With a NPV of 99%, the Dxcover Liquid Biopsy test could assist in primary care for efficient stratification of patients toward diagnostic imaging.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerAdultAgedFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studiesbrain cancerbrain tumourearly detectionliquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID41468686
PMCPMC12804056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.