Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41468579›Full record

Trial reportJMIR cancer2025

MyPainPal, a Novel mHealth App to Improve Pain in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Single-Arm Pilot Study.

Desiree R Azizoddin, Michael Hassett, Kris-Ann S Anderson, Daniela Kessler, Alexi Wright, Madeline Gorra, Benjamin Kematick, Isaac Chua, Douglas Brandoff, Kate Lally and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03717402 (Smartphone Technology to Alleviate Malignant Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03717402 nacompletednot on this map

Smartphone Technology to Alleviate Malignant Pain (STAMP): Development and Piloting of a Novel mHealth Intervention to Support Cancer Patients, Nurses, and Physicians in Opioid Management

TypeinterventionalSponsorDana-Farber Cancer InstituteRan2018 to 2022Enrolled20ConditionsCancer, Pain Management, Opioid UseArmsIntervention Participants
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Desiree R AzizoddinDepartment of Supportive Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6993-1776
Michael HassettDepartment of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0754-3510
Kris-Ann S AndersonOU Health, Boston, OK, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4838-9305
Daniela KesslerDepartment of Supportive Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9727-9559
Alexi WrightDepartment of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9776-7114
Madeline GorraDivision of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0009-0001-1468-9713
Benjamin KematickDepartment of Supportive Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2124-6272
Isaac ChuaDepartment of Supportive Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8404-8452
Douglas BrandoffDepartment of Supportive Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8576-1313
Kate LallyDepartment of Supportive Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9891-5927
Lida NabatiDepartment of Supportive Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-3490-001X
Susan MacIsaacDepartment of Supportive Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-5408-2141
James A TulskyDepartment of Supportive Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7458-0453
Andrea EnzingerDepartment of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7502-8081

Funding

A Palliative Care mHealth Intervention to Support Advanced Cancer Patients and Oncology Providers in Opioid ManagementR21NR017745 · NINR · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI ENZINGER, ANDREA C · 2018 to 2019
$485k
NINR NIH HHS R21 NR017745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain is common among patients with advanced cancer and is often inadequately controlled. Opioids are central to treatment; yet, self-management is challenging, and clinicians lack scalable tools to monitor and support patients between visits.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of MyPainPal (Dana-Faber Cancer Institute), a novel mobile health app designed to optimize cancer pain management. MyPainPal combines daily surveys assessing symptoms and analgesic use, algorithmic self-management support, tailored psychoeducation, and clinician monitoring. Secondary objectives were to explore preliminary clinical impact and identify priorities for refinement.

methodsThis single-arm pilot study enrolled adults with advanced malignancies using opioids for moderate-to-severe pain from an outpatient palliative care clinic at a comprehensive cancer center. Participants used MyPainPal for 28 days while nurses monitored symptom responses via a secure portal, and also completed structured surveys at end-of-study. Primary assessment of usability and acceptability included the System Usability Scale (SUS; range 0-100), the Acceptability E-Scale (range 6-30), and ratings of satisfaction using a 5-point Likert scale. Semistructured debriefing interviews explored user experience, perceived impact, and suggestions for optimization.

resultsTwenty participants with advanced cancer enrolled, with a mean age of 57 (SD 12.3) years, 55% (11/20) female, 80% (16/20) non-Hispanic White, with mixed cancer types. Over the 28-day study, patients logged into MyPainPal a median of 14 (IQR 8-17) times, and completed a median of 8 (IQR 5-14) symptom surveys, reflecting mean of 36% (SD 20%) of eligible (out-of-hospital) days on study. Usability and acceptability ratings of MyPainPal were high (mean SUS 78.3, SD 16.2; mean Acceptability E-Scale 24.0, SD 4.4); 79% rated overall satisfaction of greater than or equal to 4/5. Twenty percent of surveys generated an alert, prompting nurse outreach. In response, 5 participants had symptom medications changed and 2 had medication errors corrected. In debriefing interviews, many participants described that the intervention reduced barriers to pain reporting and facilitated timely and constructive interactions with care teams for symptom management. Several noted that the intervention validated their pain experience, reduced stigma around opioid use, enabled constructive conversations with providers, and promoted self-management. Patients recommended several survey modifications, including reducing their frequency and enabling more nuanced pain assessments. Participants underused the educational resources and suggested that they be featured more prominently. Some patients suggested that the MyPainPal app should be introduced earlier in patients' cancer pain trajectory when pain needs are higher and opioid management is novel.

conclusionsIn this pilot study, MyPainPal demonstrated feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary evidence of potential clinical impact among patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care. The app has been rebuilt and optimized with attention to patient feedback and in preparation for a future efficacy study.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03717402; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03717402.

Indexed as

Cancer PainMobile ApplicationsNeoplasmsPain ManagementAdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CarePilot ProjectsSelf-ManagementTelemedicineAnalgesics, OpioidcancerconstipationmHealthmobile healthopioidspain managementsymptom management

Identifiers

PMID41468579
PMCPMC12811039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.