Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41468535›Full record

ReviewAnalytical chemistry2026

Basic Process Equation for Analytical Chemistry - An Inclusive and Conciliatory Approach.

Luis Cuadros-Rodríguez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Luis Cuadros-RodríguezDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, University of Granada, C/Fuentenueva s/n, Granada E-18071, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0162-7211

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proposal outlined in this article aims to use information flow as a benchmark for analytical chemistry. It starts with raw information, mostly implicit and nonobvious (latent information), enclosed in the analytical signal, which is transformed into explicit and interpretable target chemical information (patent information). A basic process equation is proposed, derived from the currently accepted definition of analytical chemistry, which reflects the paradigm change from measurement to information. The main innovation lies in the inclusion of a term called the 'analytical operator,' which is responsible for transforming the information. The terms of this equation are interpreted and matched with different analytical methods, as well as with the R&D activities involved in current analytical chemistry. The proposal provides, for the first time, an inclusive approach that reconciles traditional analytical methods, relying on univariate data, with analytical methods derived from the application of chemometrics (or, in the same way, data mining, machine/deep learning, artificial intelligence, etc.) based on multivariate data. For better understanding, the determination of the iodine value in vegetable oils has been considered as a guiding example demonstrating how the proposed process equation is valid throughout the different periods of analytical chemistry, regardless of the analytical method applied.

Identifiers

PMID41468535
PMCPMC12809637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.