ReviewAnalytical chemistry2026
Basic Process Equation for Analytical Chemistry - An Inclusive and Conciliatory Approach.
Review in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proposal outlined in this article aims to use information flow as a benchmark for analytical chemistry. It starts with raw information, mostly implicit and nonobvious (latent information), enclosed in the analytical signal, which is transformed into explicit and interpretable target chemical information (patent information). A basic process equation is proposed, derived from the currently accepted definition of analytical chemistry, which reflects the paradigm change from measurement to information. The main innovation lies in the inclusion of a term called the 'analytical operator,' which is responsible for transforming the information. The terms of this equation are interpreted and matched with different analytical methods, as well as with the R&D activities involved in current analytical chemistry. The proposal provides, for the first time, an inclusive approach that reconciles traditional analytical methods, relying on univariate data, with analytical methods derived from the application of chemometrics (or, in the same way, data mining, machine/deep learning, artificial intelligence, etc.) based on multivariate data. For better understanding, the determination of the iodine value in vegetable oils has been considered as a guiding example demonstrating how the proposed process equation is valid throughout the different periods of analytical chemistry, regardless of the analytical method applied.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.