ArticlePLoS genetics2025
Getting to GRIPS with MR-Egger: Modelling directional pleiotropy independently of allele coding.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Placental growth plays a key role in the link between maternal glucose levels in pregnancy and risk of preeclampsia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mendelian Randomisation Egger regression (MR-Egger) is a popular method for causal inference using single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as instrumental variables. It allows all SNPs to have direct pleiotropic effects on the outcome, provided that those effects are independent of the effects on the exposure, known as the InSIDE assumption. However, the results of MR-Egger, and the InSIDE assumption itself, are sensitive to which allele is coded as the effect allele for each SNP. A pragmatic convention is to code the alleles with positive effects on the exposure, which has some advantages in interpretation but some statistical limitations. Here we show that if the InSIDE assumption holds under all-positive coding of the exposure effects, it cannot hold under all-positive coding of the pleiotropic effects, and argue that this undermines the soundness of MR-Egger. We propose a modification that has the Genotype Recoding Invariance Property (GRIP), achieving the main aim of MR-Egger without the difficulties of allele coding. Our approach, MR-GRIP, is valid under a "Variance Independent of Covariance Explained" assumption (VICE), which amounts to an inverse relationship between exposure effects and pleiotropic effects. Examples and simulations suggest that MR-GRIP can reconcile differences between MR-Egger and alternative methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.