Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41468516›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2025

Decoding the germline genetic architecture of prostate cancer at a single cell resolution.

Cheng Wang, Tianqi Tang, Yuejun Wang, Jingjing Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cheng WangEli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Tianqi TangEli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3497-5549
Yuejun WangEli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Jingjing LiEli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6025-9522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer exhibits a strong familial association, and its heritability indicates a significant contribution from germline variants. While genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified common germline variants associated with prostate cancer risk, translating these statistical associations into functional mechanisms has remained a long-standing challenge. Consequently, most of our understanding of the genetic basis of prostate cancer stems from extensive studies of somatic mutations, leaving the germline genetic architecture largely unresolved. Because most germline variants lie in the noncoding genome and complex human diseases are predominantly driven by regulatory mutations, we herein asked which prostate cell types mediate the functional effects of germline variants, and thus represent the most genetically vulnerable populations. We generated paired epigenomic and transcriptomic profiles from reference human prostate tissues. Integrating these single-cell data with large-scale GWAS data identified a terminally differentiated luminal epithelial subtype that mediates the strongest germline risk in prostate cancer. We subsequently developed a deep learning model to score ~17 million GWAS variants based on their predicted impact on altering local chromatin accessibility in this vulnerable luminal epithelial subtype, and identified high-confidence candidate loci where high-risk germline variants likely alter promoter accessibility in prostate cancer. The implicated genes were involved in several pathways in tumorigenesis, displayed strong dosage sensitivity, and converged on the androgen receptor (AR)-mediated regulon, a mechanism also observed for somatic mutations. Overall, by unveiling cell types and candidate loci that mediate germline risk, our study defines the cell-type-specific germline architecture in prostate cancer and provides a comprehensive framework for understanding cancer heritability.

Indexed as

Germ-Line MutationProstatic NeoplasmsChromatinGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyGerm CellsHumansMalePolymorphism, Single NucleotideReceptors, AndrogenSingle-Cell AnalysisChromatinReceptors, Androgen

Identifiers

PMID41468516
PMCPMC12753072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.