ArticlePloS one2025
Impact of distance and vertical placement of distal implants on bone mechanics in bar-retained overdenture treatment: A 3D finite element study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn bar-retained, four-implant supported overdentures, implant positioning influences load transfer to the bone. Variations in distance and vertical alignment between implants may alter stress and strain distribution, affecting long-term outcomes. This study evaluates how the distance and vertical position of the distal implant relative to its neighboring implant affect stress and strain in the surrounding bone using 3D finite element analysis. MATERIALS AND
methodsFour groups were formed by shifting the neighboring implant mesially at 1 mm intervals, creating inter-implant distances of 3.8, 4.7, 5.6, and 6.5 mm. Each group included seven subgroups, where the distal implant was vertically positioned 1, 2, or 3 mm coronally or apically relative to its neighbor. A vertical load of 100 N was applied to the bar's cantilever. Von Mises stress, maximum and minimum principal stresses, and strain values were calculated for 28 models.
resultsMaximum compressive stress and strain were observed at the distal aspect of the cortical bone surrounding the distal implant, averaging -49 Mpa (megapascal) and 3100 µε (microstrains), respectively. Apical positioning of the distal implant reduced compressive stress and strain by up to 22%, whereas coronal positioning produced similar or slightly lower compressive values but increased tensile stress and strain in the mesial cortical bone around the neighboring implant (maximum 25.7 MPa and 1578 µε). Increasing the interimplant distance consistently elevated both stress and strain in the surrounding bone.
conclusionWithin the limitations of finite element analysis, minor vertical deviations in distal implant positioning due to bone irregularities or defects do not substantially increase cortical bone stress or strain. However, greater horizontal spacing between implants may result in higher biomechanical loads, emphasizing the importance of careful implant positioning for long-term success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.