ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Receipt of a psychosocial intervention for prenatal anxiety and risk of perinatal intimate partner violence in Pakistani women.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mental health and intimate partner violence (IPV) are urgent public health problems in the perinatal period. We examined whether a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) intervention designed to lower prenatal anxiety led to differing risk of perinatal IPV between the intervention and control arms. We investigated if social support or spousal relationship quality in the third trimester mediated this association. The analysis included 755 pregnant Pakistani women with at least mild anxiety participating in a randomized clinical trial, which was conducted from April 2019 to October 2022. Intervention arm participants received up to six CBT-based treatment sessions (and up to five booster sessions), while controls received enhanced usual care. After implementing multivariate imputation using chained equations (MICE), we conducted log binomial regression analyses to assess the risk ratios (RRs) for any, physical, and emotional IPV in the intervention versus control arms. We assessed the mediating roles of spousal relationship and social support in the third trimester through causal mediation analyses. 27.7% of participants experienced any perinatal IPV. Compared to women in the control group, those in the intervention arm had significantly lower risk of reporting any IPV (adjusted risk ratio (aRR)=0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.58-0.91), physical IPV (aRR = 0.63, 95% CI:0.45-0.89), and emotional IPV (aRR = 0.74, 95% CI:0.56-0.93). These associations were partially mediated by spousal relationship quality and social support available in the third trimester. Receipt of a CBT intervention aiming to reduce anxiety was inversely associated with risk of perinatal IPV, likely through improving social relationships during the pregnancy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.