ArticlePloS one2025
Crop classification with UAV multispectral remote sensing, employing an enhanced ResNet50 residual network.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ResNet50 residual network model is characterized by its rapid training speed and high classification accuracy, demonstrating significant advantages in extracting and classifying crop features. However, the correlation and redundant information among different spectral bands in multispectral data can negatively affect classification accuracy. Additionally, the ResNet50 model does not meet the requirements for training with multi-band data, and its classification accuracy in small-scale, high-precision scenarios needs further improvement. This study focuses on flue-cured tobacco and maize to address these challenges, identifying the optimal classification band combination. Enhancements to the ResNet50 model were made by incorporating Batch Normalization (BN) layers, pyramid pooling layers, and hidden layers, experimenting with seven different combinations. The experimental results indicate that the RGB + NIR+Edge combination is the most effective for classifying flue-cured tobacco and maize, achieving an accuracy of 94.48%, precision of 94.66%, recall of 94.48%, kappa coefficient of 91.72%, and an F1 score of 94.49%. Among the seven improvement strategies, solely introducing BN layers yielded the most substantial improvements, increasing accuracy by 0.42%, precision by 0.51%, recall by 0.42%, kappa coefficient by 0.63%, and the F1 score by 0.44%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.