ArticlePloS one2025
Robustness of CNN-augmented sequential models for Li-ion battery RUL prediction under data scarcity.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction for Lithium-ion batteries is critical for system safety, yet its efficacy is frequently limited by data scarcity in industrial contexts. The robustness of hybrid architectures combining Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with sequential models, a potential solution, has not been systematically evaluated. This study addresses this knowledge gap by first using a CNN to derive low-dimensional feature representations from full charge-discharge cycles. We then systematically assess the performance of five prominent sequential models (GRU, LSTM, Transformer, Neural ODE, and Transformer (Pre-LN)) on these features under progressively severe data scarcity (0%, 10%, 30%, and 50% cycle removal). Based on leave-one-out cross-validation on the NASA and CALCE datasets, the analysis demonstrates that the CNN-based feature extraction significantly enhances the robustness of all tested sequential models. Furthermore, recurrent networks such as GRU and LSTM, possessing strong sequential inductive biases, consistently outperform more complex architectures under data-constrained conditions. This research validates a robust predictive methodology and provides practical insights for developing reliable RUL predictors for industrial applications where data is sparse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.