ArticlePloS one2025
Determinants of non-utilization of health facilities for childbirth in Papua New Guinea: Evidence from the demographic and health survey.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth facility-based childbirth services are essential for reducing maternal and neonatal mortality. Yet, these services remain underutilized in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Papua New Guinea (PNG), where birthing at home or in village settings continue to predominate. This study investigated the determinants of non-utilization of health facilities for childbirth among women in PNG.
methodsData from a weighted sample of 6,432 women using the 2016-2018 PNG Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) were analyzed. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the factors associated with the non-utilization of health facilities for childbirth. The adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 30.0.
resultsOverall, 58.3% (95% CI: 57.0-59.5) of women did not give birth in a health facility. Women were more likely to give birth at home or in the village if they had no formal education (AOR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.11-2.09), lived in rural areas (AOR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.11-1.75), were from the Southern (AOR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.01-1.54), or Momase (AOR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02-1.83) regions, made their own healthcare decisions (AOR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.10-4.14), had these decisions made by their husbands (AOR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.13-2.63), walked to a health facility (AOR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00-1.67), or traveled more than 24 hours to access care (AOR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.39-2.70), and had no antenatal care visits during pregnancy (AOR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.04-1.51).
conclusionsOver half of the women in this study did not utilize health facilities for childbirth. Demographic and health service-related factors influenced the non-utilization of facility-based childbirth, highlighting the need to scale up maternal health services. Increasing uptake of facility-based childbirth requires coordinated system-level efforts and incentive-based interventions that promote antenatal care and skilled birth attendance, especially for rural women. Male-inclusive strategies in maternal health decision-making are critical for improving women's access to and utilization of facility-based childbirth services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.