ArticlePloS one2025
Combined effects of heavy metals and microplastics on maize grown in acid and alkaline soils inoculated with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microplastic particles (MPs) are recognized as novel pollutants, and their interactions with heavy metals (HMs) in soil can threaten ecosystem health and agricultural productivity. This study evaluates the combined effects of biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) and non-biodegradable low-density polyethylene (LDPE) MPs and HMs include lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), zinc (Zn), and nickel (Ni) on soil properties and maize growth. Maize was grown in alkaline (pH = 7.8) and acidic (pH = 5.6) soils under five MPs treatments (control, 1% LDPE, 5% LDPE, 1% PLA and 5% PLA) and Plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) treatments including control, Pseudomonas fluorescens (P. fluorescens) and Azospirillum lipoferum (A. lipoferum) for 50 days. Results showed that PLA increased soil pH, while LDPE decreased it. Microplastic particles elevated electrical conductivity (EC) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC), with LDPE having a stronger effect on EC and PLA on DOC. LDPE enhanced HMs uptake in maize, whereas PLA decreased it. In alkaline soil, both MPs reduced plant biomass; however, reduction was not significant in PLA treatments. In contrast, in acidic soil, PLA increased shoot and root dry weights by 22.5% and 47.95%, respectively. The 5% LDPE treatment without bacteria caused the most significant reduction in shoot and root dry weights with decreases of 33.4% and 42.8% in alkaline soil; 26.8% and 21.1% in acidic soil respectively. PGPR increased soil DOC, improved plant growth, mitigated LDPE's negative effects, and amplified PLA's benefits. These findings highlight the importance of MP type, soil conditions, and PGPR for managing MPs-HMs contamination, with PLA and PGPR as sustainable agriculture strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.