ArticlePloS one2025
Time-series analysis for forecasting monthly workload at two elephant hospitals in Thailand.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing demand for elephant healthcare in Thailand underscores the need for efficient resource management in veterinary hospitals. Treating sick elephants requires substantial medical inputs, and without accurate workload forecasting, hospitals risk shortages in staff, equipment, and medications, potentially compromising care quality. This study evaluated six time-series forecasting models- Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average and its seasonal model (ARIMA/SARIMA), Exponential Smoothing (ETS), Trigonometric, Box-Cox ARMA Trend Seasonality (TBATS), Neural Network Time Series Regression (NNTR), Prophet, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)-to predict monthly workloads at two major elephant hospitals: the National Elephant Institute (NEI) hospital in northern Thailand and the Department of Livestock Development (DLD) hospital in the northeast. Historical admission data spanning five years (NEI) and nine years (DLD) were analyzed. The ETS model achieved the highest accuracy at NEI, outperforming all other models by effectively capturing its stable and seasonal caseload patterns. In contrast, the NNTR model performed best at DLD, where it accommodated irregular fluctuations likely driven by external factors. Forecasts for 2025 suggested a consistent caseload at NEI (28-31 cases/month) and a declining trend at DLD, with the lowest projection in September. Although patient volume was low, each case demanded disproportionately high resources, justifying the need for anticipatory planning. This study provides the first demonstration that multi-model time-series forecasting can generate actionable insights using sparse, real-world data from wildlife hospitals. By embedding predictive analytics into routine operations, it offers a novel, scalable framework to support data-driven decision-making in endangered species care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.