ArticleRestorative neurology and neuroscience2026
Contralesional Crossed Facilitation Impairs Bimanual Force Coordination in Chronic Stroke Survivors with Moderate-to-Mild Motor Impairment.
Article in Restorative neurology and neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAfter stroke, impaired bimanual coordination reduces quality of life, where precise coordination of force between arms is essential for daily activities. Effective coordination relies on balanced interhemispheric communication, which induces crossed facilitation between primary motor cortices (M1). Intracortical inhibition influences both crossed facilitation and bimanual coordination in neurologically intact individuals. This study examines whether GABA
methodsThirteen chronic stroke participants performed dynamic and isometric bimanual force grip task. In the dynamic task, the paretic hand maintained 30% of maximal voluntary contraction while the non-paretic hand varied force levels (low-mid-high). Cross-covariance coefficient between hands measured interference from non-paretic hand to paretic hand. In the isometric task, transcranial magnetic stimulation assessed crossed facilitation via motor evoked potential (MEP) and intracortical inhibition via cortical silent period (CSP) in ipsilesional M1 under varying bimanual force conditions (paretic: rest, 5%, 30%; non-paretic: rest, 10%, 30%, 70%).
resultsResults showed variable bimanual interference post-stroke, with greater interference in less impaired individuals and under high non-paretic force. Crossed facilitation increased with higher force asymmetry and lower paretic effort, particularly in less impaired participants, but became more variable as paretic effort increased (during PH 30%: NPH 70%). Under the high asymmetry condition, GABA
conclusionThese findings suggest that reduced inhibitory tone may contribute to the regulation of crossed facilitation, and bimanual coordination deficits may be driven by excessive crossed facilitation. Future work will examine other ipsilesional factors regulating crossed facilitation, as targeted asymmetric training and neuromodulation may help improve bimanual coordination in individuals with moderate-to-mild motor impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.