Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41468016›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Treatment Patterns and Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Kelsey S Lau-Min, Angela C Tramontano, Franklin Iheanacho, Thomas Adam Abrams, Christopher R Manz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kelsey S Lau-MinDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Angela C TramontanoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Franklin IheanachoWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Thomas Adam AbramsDepartment of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christopher R ManzDepartment of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The treatment landscape for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is rapidly evolving, with the approval of multiple systemic therapies for patients with advanced disease since 2017. However, ideal treatment sequencing approaches remain unknown, and data on clinical practice patterns are limited. Objective: To evaluate current treatment patterns, sequencing, and survival outcomes among patients receiving systemic therapy for HCC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from a nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived database of more than 280 oncology practices at more than 800 US cancer clinics to assess adult patients who were treated with systemic therapy for HCC from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2023. Exposure: First-line systemic therapy type. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from first-line systemic therapy initiation to death, last clinical activity, or the censor date of December 31, 2023. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from first-line systemic therapy initiation to the earliest of EHR-documented disease progression, death, last clinical encounter, or the censor date. Results: Among 4198 patients (median [IQR] age, 67 [61-74] years; 3353 [79.9%] male), sorafenib was the most common first-line systemic therapy until it was overtaken by atezolizumab-bevacizumab in 2020; durvalumab-tremelimumab also became a common first-line therapy in 2023. Of the full study cohort, 871 (20.7%) received second-line therapy. Median OS was 8.1 months (95% CI, 7.7-8.6 months) but was not significantly associated with first-line systemic therapy type. Median PFS was 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.7-4.0 months); first-line atezolizumab-bevacizumab (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99) was associated with improved PFS compared with sorafenib. Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of patients treated with systemic therapy for HCC between 2011 and 2023, atezolizumab-bevacizumab and durvalumab-tremelimumab emerged as the most common first-line systemic therapies administered for HCC, but relatively few patients received second-line therapy. Additional research is needed to determine optimal treatment sequencing and increase the likelihood that patients may benefit from second-line systemic therapy options.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabDisease ProgressionElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalatezolizumabBevacizumabdurvalumabProtein Kinase InhibitorsSorafenibtremelimumab

Identifiers

PMID41468016
PMCPMC12754679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.