ArticleJAMA network open2025
Accelerated Brain Aging, Atherogenicity, and Neurocognition in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Malondialdehyde at the Crossroads of Oxidative Stress, Lipid Peroxidation, Ferroptosis, and Hematological Malignancies: A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Digital Twin models to address long-term treatment toxicities in children and young adults with cancer.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Long-term survivors of childhood cancer may be at elevated risk for accelerated brain aging. Objectives: To determine the brain age gap estimation (BrainAGE), defined as the difference between estimated brain age and chronological age; the association between BrainAGE scores and poor neurocognitive outcomes; and the correlations of plasma biomarkers of oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and cardiovascular health with older BrainAGE scores and previous exposure to central nervous system-directed therapy in adult survivors of childhood cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed participants in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. Included participants were survivors of childhood cancer (brain tumor, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and Hodgkin lymphoma) and community controls (no history of childhood cancer) aged 18 years or older with a whole brain scan following a neurocognitive assessment. BrainAGE was calculated from January 2016 to February 2021 and analyzed from February 2022 to March 2025. Treatment information, plasma biomarkers, and neurocognitive outcomes were collected. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was estimated brain age (using previously trained machine learning pipelines) and associations of brain age with neurocognitive outcomes. Associations among BrainAGE scores, plasma biomarkers, and neurocognitive outcomes were examined using multivariable linear regression models and Spearman correlations. Results: A total of 253 survivors of childhood cancer (127 males [50.2%]; mean [SD] age, 31.7 [8.6] years; mean [SD] time since diagnosis, 21.2 [9.8] years) and 43 community controls (24 females [55.8%]; mean [SD] age at evaluation, 31.4 [9.6] years) were included in analyses. Survivors had significantly higher mean BrainAGE scores than controls (6.6 [95% CI, -12.5 to 41.1] years vs 0.7 [95% CI, -1.0 to 2.4] years older than chronological age; P < .001). A 10-year increase in BrainAGE score was associated with lower cognitive flexibility (β = -0.63; 95% CI, -0.82 to -0.45), processing speed (β = -0.49; 95% CI, -0.67 to -0.31), working memory (β = -0.28; 95% CI, -0.53 to -0.03) and visual memory (β = -0.40; 95% CI, -0.58 to -0.22), vocabulary (β = -0.33; 95% CI, -0.48 to -0.18), and reading (β = -0.31; 95% CI, -0.45 to -0.18) z scores after adjusting for age at diagnosis and sex. Neurofilament light was correlated with BrainAGE score in female survivors (Spearman ρ = 0.24 [P = .04]) and controls (Spearman ρ = -0.47 [P = .03]). Female survivors who were younger than 10 years at cancer diagnosis and treated with 40 Gy or higher cranial radiation had mean BrainAGE scores higher than 30 years (37.34 [95% CI, 17.4-41.0] years) older than chronological age (P = .004) and had lower sex hormone precursor correlated with higher BrainAGE score (Spearman ρ = -0.44 [P = .01]) and higher cranial radiation dose (Spearman ρ = -0.48 [P = .01]). Among male survivors, correlations of BrainAGE score and cranial radiation dose with malondialdehyde (Spearman ρ = -0.25 [P = .04] and -0.26 [P = .04]) and oxidized low-density lipoprotein (Spearman ρ = 0.24 [P = .049] and 0.40 [P = .001]) were identified. Conclusion and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that accelerated brain aging was associated with poorer neurocognitive outcomes and correlated with cranial radiation, biomarkers of atherogenesis, neuronal damage, and sex hormone precursors. These findings can guide future research efforts to reduce the risk of vascular disease in this at-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.