Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41467931›Full record

ArticleHealth economics review2025

Sustainable AI in medicine: navigating innovation, challenges, and environmental impact.

Elena Bignami, Luigino Jalale Darhour, Valentina Bellini

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elena BignamiAnesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Division, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Viale Gramsci 14, Parma, 43126, Italy. elenagiovanna.bignami@unipr.it.
Luigino Jalale DarhourAnesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Division, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Viale Gramsci 14, Parma, 43126, Italy.
Valentina BelliniAnesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Division, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Viale Gramsci 14, Parma, 43126, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing the healthcare sector, offering unprecedented opportunities to enhance clinical efficiency, decision-making, and patient outcomes. However, alongside these benefits, AI brings considerable environmental costs due to its high computational demands. The study by Pariso et al. on AI-driven energy management in Italian hospitals illustrates the dual nature of this transformation, highlighting both the potential for increased efficiency and the structural challenges involved. In this context, the paradigm of Green AI has emerged, advocating for environmentally sustainable approaches to AI development and implementation in healthcare. MAIN TEXT: While AI offers tools to optimize hospital operations, such as predictive maintenance, resource allocation, and patient flow, its widespread adoption demands vast computational resources. These requirements result in significant energy consumption, CO₂ emissions, freshwater use, and electronic waste. Data centers, essential to AI functionality, contribute notably to global electricity use and water stress, especially in areas already facing environmental constraints. To address these concerns, healthcare institutions should adopt strategies such as energy monitoring tools, lifecycle assessments, and low-carbon infrastructures. Implementing circular approaches, including waste heat reuse and equipment recycling, can further mitigate environmental impact. Beyond being a source of resource consumption, AI can also support sustainability in healthcare through intelligent systems that optimize water use, manage medical waste, and reduce material inefficiencies. Moreover, AI-enabled telemedicine, remote monitoring, and personalized patient support can significantly lower the need for physical infrastructure use, aligning healthcare delivery with environmental goals. These innovations not only support sustainability but also foster a culture of responsibility and efficiency among healthcare professionals.

conclusionsThe integration of AI in medicine must be accompanied by critical reflection on its environmental footprint. Through standardized monitoring, efficient design practices, and circular resource management, healthcare systems can harness the power of AI while minimizing ecological harm. Future research should explore the environmental trade-offs of AI-enabled clinical workflows, assess energy and material use, and promote Fair AI to ensure equity and global health inclusion. By aligning innovation, fairness, and environmental responsibility, AI can fulfill its promise of advancing medical science without compromising planetary health.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceEnvironmental impactFair AIGreen AISustainable solutions

Identifiers

PMID41467931
PMCPMC12754882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.