Observational studyAging clinical and experimental research2025
Driving knowledge assessment in cognitively impaired older adults: evidence from geriatric day hospitals.
Observational study in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence and appropriate tools are often lacking to support the decision of driving discontinuation in cognitively impaired older adults by Alzheimer's disease and related disorders. Maintaining strong driving knowledge as individuals age is crucial for ensuring their fitness to drive. The objectives of this study were to describe the driving knowledge of older drivers > 65 referred for cognitive assessment compared to control subjects. We also analyzed the relationship between neuropsychological tests and driving knowledge assessment.
methodsCross-sectional, observational, multicenter study in geriatric day hospitals including older drivers with cognitive complaints who underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. Their performance on a driving theory test (knowledge of driving laws and road rules) and self-evaluation of driving abilities were assessed via a computer-based exam and compared to those of healthy younger drivers. Regression models were used to examine the relationship between driving knowledge and the neuropsychological examination scores with adjustment for age, gender and cognitive performance.
resultsWe included 144 patients (mean age 79.6 ± 4.9) and 249 controls (mean age 28.1 ± 6.6). Performance in the driving theory test was significantly lower in patients than in controls (p < 0.001). We showed a significative association between driving knowledge, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) independent from age, gender and cognitive performance.
conclusionOur study has raised concerns regarding the overall poor theoretical driving skills in older drivers and their low self-evaluation ability. The MoCA and the DSTT may be useful for guiding driving discontinuation in cognitively impaired older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.