Observational studyJournal of epidemiology and global health2025
Prevalence of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in Fracture Patients: a Tertiary Trauma Center Observation.
Observational study in Journal of epidemiology and global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComplementary and alternative medicine (CAM) treatment practices are frequently utilized by patients alongside conventional modern medicine. CAM options are commonly practiced by orthopedic trauma patients and are usually driven by cultural and sometimes religious beliefs. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence, practices and influencing factors of CAM use among orthopedic patients. METHODOLOGY: An observational cross-sectional survey study was carried out at the Orthopedic Department fracture clinics in a tertiary trauma center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Participants were recruited from orthopedic fracture clinics and requested to complete a questionnaire survey.
resultsAmong the 356 surveyed fracture patients, 49.4% reported using CAM. Of these CAM users, 20.5% patients used CAM for the first time after being diagnosed with fracture, while 79.5% of patients had previously utilized CAM and increased their usage after fracture diagnosis. CAM practices were significantly associated with older age, joint reconstructive fracture treatment, and reported disability/dependence. Fenugreek was the most commonly consumed type by 81% of CAM users. The key motivations for CAM use were the perception of enhancing the fracture healing process and maintaining good health. Notably, 61.5% of CAM users reported experiencing improvements in their physical health, while 9.0% of the users experienced adverse effects such as weight gain and joint pain.
conclusionOur study shed a light on the high prevalence of CAM usage among fracture patients, with Fenugreek being the most popular. Potential influencing factors for CAM practices were investigated including demographic, socioeconomic as well as fracture-related factors. Despite its high prevalence, CAM use is often not discussed with the treating physicians, therefore, increased physician awareness and enhanced patient communication about CAM practices are essential. Further investigations are required to explore CAM adverse effects as well as impact on fracture healing and general health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.