ArticleJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology2026
Diagnostic Value of Peak-to-Basal Difference or Ratio of Growth Hormone in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency
Article in Journal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is a rare but important cause of short stature in children. Although GH stimulation tests remain the gold standard for diagnosis, establishing a definitive diagnosis continues to be challenging. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the peak-to-basal ratio and difference for identifying GHD in children. Methods: Patients with short stature who were evaluated for GHD with GH stimulation tests were retrospectively assessed. ΔGH was defined as the difference between peak and basal GH levels. The GH ratio was calculated as the ratio of peak to basal GH levels. Results: Data were collected from 265 patients (182 prepubertal) with a median age at presentation of 10.6 years (interquartile range: 6.13-12.42), of whom 46.7% were female. In total, 146 patients met the diagnostic criteria for GHD. ΔGH and GH ratio during the L-Dopa and Clonidine stimulation tests were significantly lower in the GHD group (p<0.001). A ΔGH cut-off of ≤7.08 in the clonidine test demonstrated excellent discriminative ability, with both sensitivity and specificity above 80%, and an area under the curve close to 0.9, suggesting that this parameter may may provide supportive diagnostic information for GHD. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, ΔGH has been explored only in a limited number of studies. This study investigated diagnostic accuracy of difference (ΔGH) or ratio of peak-to-basal GH on a large cohort of children with short stature. The supportive diagnostic performance observed in our cohort suggests that ΔGH is clinically useful in routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.