ArticleTurkish journal of orthodontics2025
Comparison of Mechanical, Surface, and Chemical Properties of Different Thermoplastic Retainer Materials before and after Thermoforming: Scanning Electron Microscopy and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy Analyses.
Article in Turkish journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface hardness, surface roughness, and chemical structure changes of four vacuum-formed retainer (VFR) materials after thermoforming. Methods: Four groups of VFR materials were evaluated: Taglus, Lumex-G, Atmos, and Duran. Each group consisted of 12 samples (n=12) that were thermoformed according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Surface roughness was measured using a high-precision profilometer, and hardness was assessed with a micro-Vickers hardness tester. Chemical structure analysis was conducted using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and surface morphology was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: Hardness measurements demonstrated a general decrease across all groups following thermoforming. After thermoforming, surface roughness increased significantly in the Taglus and Lumex-G groups, whereas the Atmos and Duran groups maintained greater surface stability. FTIR demonstrated that all materials retained their chemical stability, and no significant changes in functional groups were detected. SEM results revealed more pronounced surface irregularities in the Taglus and Lumex-G groups. Conclusion: Polyethylene terephthalate glycol copolyester-based materials with high surface homogeneity, such as Atmos and Duran, may be recommended for clinical use due to their superior surface stability and chemical resilience. By contrast, the surface irregularities observed in Taglus and Lumex-G may compromise their long-term clinical performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.