Observational studyJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2026
Clinical Validation of a Fast MRI Method to Evaluate Brain Vascular and Parenchymal Abnormalities in Sturge-Weber Syndrome.
Observational study in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cognitive impairment patterns and associated clinical and imaging characteristics in young patients with Sturge-Weber syndrome.Brain & development · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) is a rare neurocutaneous disorder associated with venous capillary malformations, atrophy, and calcifications. Longitudinal imaging is limited by risks of sedation and gadolinium exposure in children. PURPOSE: To evaluate whether strategically acquired gradient echo (STAGE), a rapid multi-contrast quantitative MRI method, can reliably detect vascular and parenchymal abnormalities in SWS compared with conventional pre-/post-contrast MRI. STUDY TYPE: Observational cross-sectional. POPULATION: Twenty-two patients with unilateral SWS diagnosed by previous MRI (13 female; ages 2-24 years). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T/T1-weighted (T1W) and T2-weighted (T2W) turbo-spin-echo, fluid attenuated inversion recovery, and a 3D gradient echo-based STAGE sequence providing T1, proton density (PD), T2*, and R2* maps, susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), T1W with enhanced gray matter to white matter contrast (T1WE), and synthetic images of T2W, FLAIR, and gradient echo images. ASSESSMENT: Conventional MRI and STAGE images were reviewed in 10 patients (training group), side-by-side, to determine the STAGE-derived images that identify SWS abnormalities, including leptomeningeal venous capillary malformations (LVCM), enlarged deep medullary veins, choroid plexus enlargement, cerebral atrophy, and calcifications. In the remaining test group of 12 patients, three reviewers scored these abnormalities on STAGE images and compared them with scores from conventional MRI. STATISTICAL TESTS: Interrater reliability with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Spearman's rank correlation, Wilcoxon signed-ranked test, Mann-Whitney U-test, Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance level was set as p < 0.05.
resultsLVCMs were visualized on STAGE with SWI and R2*. Calcifications were differentiated from venous abnormalities using PD, T1WE, synthetic gradient echo, and QSM. STAGE-derived scores had excellent interrater reliability (ICCs > 0.90) and were similar to the conventional MRI scores despite some minor differences in some individual cases (total scores from conventional MRI vs. STAGE 8.9 vs. 8.7, p = 0.29). DATA
conclusionSTAGE provided rapid, non-contrast, multi-parametric imaging that reliably detected vascular and parenchymal SWS abnormalities seen on conventional MRI. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.