ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2026
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Balloon-Expandable Versus Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Small Aortic Annulus.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Procedural and Hemodynamic Outcomes of Contemporary Self-Expanding Valves for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Multicenter Comparison From the AMTRAC Registry.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes after balloon- or self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement in small aortic annuli.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Article
- BEVs Versus SEVs in Women With Small Annuli: 7-Year Insights From the OCEAN-TAVI Registry.JACC. Asia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSelf-expanding valves (SEVs) have demonstrated superior hemodynamic performance and comparable clinical outcomes to balloon-expandable valves (BEVs) at 1 year in patients with a small aortic annulus. However, long-term data are limited. This study aimed to evaluate 5-year echocardiographic and clinical outcomes of SEVs versus BEVs in patients with small aortic annulus underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
methodsWe analyzed RESOLVE registry patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement at Cedars-Sinai between 2015 and 2020. Patients with a small aortic annulus (<430 mm
resultsAmong 1392 transcatheter aortic valve replacement recipients, 423 (78 SEVs, 345 BEVs) met the small annulus criteria. SEVs were associated with lower transvalvular gradients and larger indexed effective orifice area at discharge and 1 year (
conclusionAlthough SEVs provide better hemodynamic performance in patients with severe aortic stenosis and small annuli, this advantage did not translate into improved survival or reduced cardiovascular events at 5 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.