ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2026
Clinically Applicable Machine Learning Approach to Predict Intracerebral Hematoma Expansion.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in neurovascular surgery: advancing diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Machine learning integration of routine inflammatory biomarkers for predicting remote punctate ischemic lesions following intracerebral hemorrhage: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHematoma expansion (HE) is a significant risk factor for poor prognosis in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Accurately predicting HE is crucial for determining optimal treatment strategies.
methodsThis study enrolled 452 patients with ICH from 10 hospitals. To predict HE, 28 clinical variables available on patient arrival (including medical history, ICH location, and ICH volume) and 1142 radiomics features extracted from noncontrast computed tomography images of the ICH regions were used. Clinical variables and radiomics features were selected using gradient boosting and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Three HE prediction models were built on clinical variables alone, radiomics features alone, and a third combining both. The models were compared using 5-fold cross-validation, and the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated for each. Additionally, the important features of HE prediction in the combined model were explored.
resultsThe combined model demonstrated the highest performance for predicting HE with a 5-fold mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.77±0.05, compared with 0.70±0.06 for the clinical variables alone and 0.73±0.04 for the radiomics features alone. Permutation feature importance analysis suggested that anticoagulant treatment was the most predictive of HE.
conclusionsA predictive model for HE was developed using the medical history, clinical features available on the patient's arrival, imaging, and radiomics features extracted from computed tomography images. This prediction model will assist non-stroke care specialists in making treatment decisions for ICH in emergency settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.