Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41467225›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025

Thromboembolic risk of electrical cardioversion in patients with cardiogenic shock.

Jonas Gmeiner, Lea Haag, Enzo Lüsebrink, Jan-Philipp Simon, Felix Michelson, Elina Oesterhaus, Wolf-Stephan Rudi, Ludwig Weckbach, Stefan Kääb, Michael Näbauer and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jonas GmeinerDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lea HaagDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Enzo LüsebrinkDepartment of Medicine II, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Jan-Philipp SimonDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Felix MichelsonDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Elina OesterhausDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Wolf-Stephan RudiDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig WeckbachDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stefan KääbDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany & German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site: Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany.
Michael NäbauerDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sven PeterßDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christopher StremmelDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Steffen MassbergDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany & German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site: Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany.
Martin OrbanDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Moritz F SinnerDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Clemens SchererDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany & German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site: Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiogenic shock patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter often require acute cardioversion despite absence of sufficient anticoagulation or the possibility to rule out left atrial appendage thrombus. Thromboembolic risk in these patients is unknown. Methods: In this study, all cardiogenic shock patients from the LMUshock registry undergoing electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter were included. The primary endpoint was new thromboembolic stroke or systemic embolism at 30 days. Secondary endpoints included performance of transesophageal echocardiography, all-cause mortality and bleeding according to BARC. Results: Of 140 patients undergoing electrical cardioversion, 36 had preexisting and 104 experienced new onset of atrial fibrillation or flutter during ICU stay. Of these, 87.1 % had anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin and anticoagulation was adjudicated sufficient in 44.3 % at the time of cardioversion. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed in 37.9 % of patients before cardioversion. The primary endpoint was met in 3 patients (2.1 %), all of which had insufficient anticoagulation. All-cause mortality at 30 days was 37.9 % and bleeding ≥ BARC type 3a was found in 12.9 %. Conclusions: Thromboembolic risk of electrical cardioversion was low despite the limited utilization of transesophageal echocardiography. This may be attributed to the routine administration of therapeutic anticoagulation in this study, but a high incidence of bleeding was observed.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationAtrial flutterCardiogenic shockCardioversionStroke

Identifiers

PMID41467225
PMCPMC12744523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.