ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
Thromboembolic risk of electrical cardioversion in patients with cardiogenic shock.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent highlights from the International Journal of Cardiology Heart & Vasculature: thrombosis and antithrombotic therapy across the cardiovascular continuum.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiogenic shock patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter often require acute cardioversion despite absence of sufficient anticoagulation or the possibility to rule out left atrial appendage thrombus. Thromboembolic risk in these patients is unknown. Methods: In this study, all cardiogenic shock patients from the LMUshock registry undergoing electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter were included. The primary endpoint was new thromboembolic stroke or systemic embolism at 30 days. Secondary endpoints included performance of transesophageal echocardiography, all-cause mortality and bleeding according to BARC. Results: Of 140 patients undergoing electrical cardioversion, 36 had preexisting and 104 experienced new onset of atrial fibrillation or flutter during ICU stay. Of these, 87.1 % had anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin and anticoagulation was adjudicated sufficient in 44.3 % at the time of cardioversion. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed in 37.9 % of patients before cardioversion. The primary endpoint was met in 3 patients (2.1 %), all of which had insufficient anticoagulation. All-cause mortality at 30 days was 37.9 % and bleeding ≥ BARC type 3a was found in 12.9 %. Conclusions: Thromboembolic risk of electrical cardioversion was low despite the limited utilization of transesophageal echocardiography. This may be attributed to the routine administration of therapeutic anticoagulation in this study, but a high incidence of bleeding was observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.