ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026
Ethics based educational interventions on end-of-life care for undergraduate nursing students: A scoping review.
Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nurses' experiences in delivering bad news to families of end-of-life patients; a qualitative content analysis.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nurses face various ethical dilemmas and conflicts in end-of-life care; however, there is no evidence of effective undergraduate ethics education on the topic settings to address them. Objectives: This review aimed to describe educational interventions for end-of-life care focused on ethical content in undergraduate nursing education and their outcomes for students. Design: This review used Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage scoping process. Methods: This study used the Ovid (CINAHL and MEDLINE) and PubMed bibliographic databases from 2012 to 2023. We included literature on qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods research that could provide information about ethical end-of-life care (EOLC) education interventions in undergraduate nursing programs. We excluded review articles to avoid duplication. The search string included ("education, nursing" OR "education, nursing, baccalaureate") AND ("ethics") OR ("terminal care" OR "hospice care" OR "end of life care" OR "palliative care"). The scope of this study was limited to studies on educational interventions for EOLC ethics in undergraduate nursing education. Results: The search yielded 4190 articles, of which 25 were included in the analysis. Fourteen of the 25 studies were conducted in the USA, whereas the others were conducted in various parts of the world. No intervention research articles were found that focused on EOLC ethics itself, which was either incorporated as part of the nursing education for EOLC or included in ethics education as an EOLC case study. Of these, 17 studies included lectures to teach EOLC ethics, and four used scenarios and case studies as teaching methods. Twelve studies used scenarios for simulation education. Seven studies combined lectures and simulations. The lectures improved students' knowledge and attitudes toward death, and their confidence in EOLC. As a result of the simulation intervention, in addition to improvements in knowledge and attitudes, participants gained communication skills, comfort with caregiving, confidence, self-efficacy, and the ability to reflect on their attitudes. Conclusions: The results suggest that while lectures are effective for acquiring ethical knowledge and attitudes related to EOLC based on ethical competency, simulations are more effective for acquiring practical skills such as communication, self-efficacy, and reflection. Incorporating ethical issues in simulations is hoped to broadly develop ethical practice competencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.