Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41467192›Full record

ReviewAsian journal of urology2025

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pregnancy: A comprehensive review and technical insights.

Daniel Pérez-Fentes, Esteban Emiliani, Ernesto Donoso, Alba García-Catalán, Lucía Mosquera-Seoane, Beatriz Ulloa-Iglesias, María E Martínez-Corral

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel Pérez-FentesEndourology Unit, Urology Department, University Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Esteban EmilianiUrology Department, Fundación Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
Ernesto DonosoEndourology Unit, Urology Department, University Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Alba García-CatalánEndourology Unit, Urology Department, University Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Lucía Mosquera-SeoaneEndourology Unit, Urology Department, University Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Beatriz Ulloa-IglesiasAnaesthesiology Department, University Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
María E Martínez-CorralEndourology Unit, Urology Department, University Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Urinary stones in pregnancy are usually managed conservatively or with temporary drainage, but in some cases, intervention is needed. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is generally avoided due to its invasiveness and the requirement for fluoroscopy. This study aimed to review the literature on the use of PCNL in pregnancy, focusing on its safety, efficacy, feasibility, and technical aspects. Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases, covering the period from January 2000 to March 2024. The search terms included "percutaneous nephrolithotomy", "PCNL", "pregnancy", and relevant variations thereof. The initial search retrieved 27 articles, of which only six studies involving 14 patients met the inclusion criteria. Results: The reviewed studies included patients aged 23-34 years who underwent PCNL between 8 weeks and 28 weeks of gestation. Preoperative evaluations were exclusively based on ultrasound imaging, with stone sizes ranging from 8 mm to 48 mm. Indications for PCNL were persistent pain despite urinary diversion or reluctance to undergo stent replacement. Fluoroscopy was avoided in 13 patients. No maternal or fetal complications were reported. Conclusion: PCNL appears to be a safe and feasible treatment option for selected cases of urinary stone disease during pregnancy. It should be performed in experienced centers, with proper patient counseling and a multidisciplinary approach to ensure the best outcomes.

Indexed as

Kidney stoneOutcomePercutaneous nephrolithotomyPregnancyUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID41467192
PMCPMC12744697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.