ArticleAsian journal of urology2025
Contralateral knee-flexion prone split-leg percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A versatile technique.
Article in Asian journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study developed a novel technique for performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the knee-flexion prone split-leg (KF-PSL) position; this technique aimed to address the shortcomings of the traditional prone (TP) position and the PSL position. The study evaluated the safety, advantages, and feasibility of the KF-PSL position compared to the TP position. Methods: A novel technique was developed based on the common PSL position. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 276 patients who underwent PCNL in either the KF-PSL or TP position between January 2022 and June 2023. Demographic and perioperative clinical data of the KF-PSL and TP groups were reviewed and compared. Results: A total of 276 patients were divided into two groups based on the operative position. The preoperative parameters of the two groups did not differ significantly. The mean stone size (represented by the aggregation of the diameter of all the stones) was 40.03 (SD 23.89) mm. Significant differences were found in both the mean operative time (80.9 [SD 47.2] min in KF-PSL Conclusion: The KF-PSL is a promising modified position for PCNL that allows for a shorter operative time, a higher stone-free rate, and a more simplified surgical procedure compared to the TP position without compromising outcomes. It is more convenient for combined therapy, allowing access to the entire urinary tract without the need for position changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.