ReviewAsian journal of urology2025
Advancements in artificial intelligence for prostate cancer: Optimizing diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic assessment.
Review in Asian journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Multimodal artificial intelligence in prostate cancer: integrating multiparametric MRI with clinicopathological, molecular, and functional imaging data.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Large language models and prostate MRI reporting: a stringent testbed for safe deployment under evolving AI, health-data, and cybersecurity regulation.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- AI for screening in healthcare: promise and challenges.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Retrospective Validation of a Resource-Aware Assistive AI Tool for Screening Prostate Needle Biopsies and Classifying Prostate Adenocarcinoma into ISUP Grade Groups.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multi-Omics profiling identify NNMT in tumor endothelium as a key regulator of CD8⁺ T cell exhaustion via the TGF signaling pathway.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Comprehensive biochemical insights into derivatives of PSA and glycosylation-specific changes in PSA: role in diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.Clinical proteomics · 2026Review
- Navigating PI-RADS v2.1 in clinical practice: pitfalls, variability, and the supportive role of AI.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Meta learning optimized TabNet for small sample repeat prostate biopsy prediction.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Comparative outcomes of focal HIFU versus active surveillance in low- and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer: a 75-month retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in urology · 2026Article
- A Multi-Modal Transfer Learning Framework to Reduce Health Disparities in Prostate Adenocarcinoma.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Next-Generation Advances in Prostate Cancer Imaging and Artificial Intelligence Applications.Journal of imaging · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Across the Prostate Cancer Pathway: Screening, Imaging, Pathology, and Biomarkers.Cureus · 2025Review
- Article
- Research progress of artificial intelligence in the early screening, diagnosis, precise treatment and prognosis prediction of three central gynecological malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current research landscape on artificial intelligence (AI) in prostate cancer (PCa) management, highlighting its potential to enhance diagnosis, improve medical image quality, facilitate risk stratification, and aid prognosis. The review also identifies opportunities and challenges associated with integrating AI into clinical practice. Methods: This review synthesizes findings from recent studies on AI applications in PCa management. It examines the use of machine learning and deep learning techniques in diagnostic imaging, surgical skill assessment, and outcome prediction. The analysis emphasizes empirical evidence demonstrating the efficacy and limitations of AI models in clinical settings. Results: AI, particularly machine learning and deep learning algorithms, is improving diagnostic accuracy by analyzing medical images with greater efficiency and precision compared to traditional methods. AI-based tools are also being developed for surgical skill assessment, offering objective evaluations and feedback to surgeons. Additionally, AI applications in predicting patient outcomes are facilitating the creation of personalized treatment plans. Empirical evidence shows that AI models exhibit higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting clinically significant PCa, outperforming conventional diagnostic techniques. Conclusion: AI holds significant promise for transforming PCa management by improving diagnostic accuracy, personalizing treatment plans, and enhancing patient outcomes. While the evidence underscores its potential, challenges such as the need for larger, more diverse datasets and addressing implementation barriers remain critical. Despite these hurdles, the benefits of AI in PCa management represent a compelling area for future research and clinical integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.