Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41467170›Full record

ArticleHealth services insights2025

Integrating Quality Improvement: A Qualitative Study of Leadership Approaches in Healthcare Services in Norwegian Municipalities.

Ingvild Røe, Maren Kristine Raknes Sogstad, Hilda Bø Lyng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ingvild RøeDepartment of Health Sciences in Gjøvik, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Care Research, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4769-5414
Maren Kristine Raknes SogstadDepartment of Health Sciences in Gjøvik, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Care Research, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2809-1384
Hilda Bø LyngFaculty of Health Sciences, Centre for Resilience in Healthcare SHARE, University of Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7107-4224

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Objective: Healthcare services must provide high-quality patient care and continuously work to improve the quality of the organization. Continuous quality improvement (QI) involves systematic and ongoing enhancements of individual treatments as well as large organizational structures. To facilitate QI, suitable organizational structures are required. This study aims to describe and explore how administrative leaders organize for continuous QI in a Norwegian municipal setting. Methods: This qualitative study examines how administrative leaders organize for QI in Norwegian municipalities by conducting semi-structured interviews with leaders and quality advisors (N = 19) in three Norwegian municipalities. The data were analyzed inductively by reflexive thematic text analysis and the software NVIVO 14. Results: The municipalities used three main approaches to organize QI, aimed at integrating QI into their governing structures. The vertical approach aligned QI formalities with hierarchical structures. The horizontal approach created tailored structures for operationalizing and implementing QI. In the mediating approach, leaders actively and continuously worked vertically, horizontally, and across levels and units to reconcile differences, cooperate, communicate, and monitor activities, securing trust and commitment toward QI. Their responsibilities were extensive, supported by delegating responsibility to lower-level leaders and quality advisors, the latter with key roles in QI. QI functioned as a planned activity and continuous process. Trust and commitment were essential across approaches. Leaders' continuous mediating activities helped address the tensions between autonomy and commitment, specialized or integrated assistance, and balancing change, trust and control. These were critical to QI's success. Conclusion: The different approaches to organizing QI facilitated the implementation of QI in various situations and alleviated tensions regarding the autonomous units' commitment to decisions and the integration or specialization of QI. The various approaches to QI, integrated with different bureaucratic models, created complex processes of layering new elements into existing structural forms, thereby modernizing municipal structures.

Indexed as

autonomous unitsbureaucracydelegationhealthcare serviceshorizontalmediating approachesNorwayorganizational structuresquality improvementvertical

Identifiers

PMID41467170
PMCPMC12743786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.