ArticleHealth services insights2025
Assessment of Abortion Methods, Management, and Patient Satisfaction Among Women Seeking Safe Abortion Services in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Nepal.
Article in Health services insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Unsafe abortion is a major contributor to maternal mortality in low- and middle-income countries. Despite the legalization of abortion and expanded access to services in Nepal, data on abortion practices and patient satisfaction remain limited. Objective: This study aimed to assess abortion methods, their management, and patient satisfaction among women seeking safe abortion services at a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal. Design: A hospital-based cross-sectional study. Methods: The study was conducted from December 2023 to May 2024 among 285 women aged ⩾18 years with gestational age of up to 12 weeks. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews and clinical records, followed by 7-day post-abortion assessment via in-person visits or phone calls. Pearson's chi-square test and binary logistic regression were performed at a 5% level of significance to identify factor associated with patient satisfaction. Result: Among 285 women, 76.8% underwent medical abortion with oral mifepristone followed by misoprostol via sublingual, buccal, or vaginal routes, while 23.2% received surgical abortion through vacuum aspiration after misoprostol pre-treatment and local anesthesia. Discharge medications commonly included analgesics (paracetamol and ibuprofen) and antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, and metronidazole). Post-abortion contraceptive uptake was 79.3%, with implants (28.8%) and condoms (28.4%) being the most chosen methods. Overall, 50.2% of women reported satisfaction with the abortion services received. Logistic regression analysis showed that higher education (AOR: 5.63; 95% CI: 2.40-13.16), extended family structure (AOR: 7.25; 95% CI: 3.11-16.91), and no history of live birth (AOR: 4.20; 95% CI: 1.48-11.93) were significantly associated with higher satisfaction, while age ⩾35 years was negatively associated (AOR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.28-0.95). Conclusion: Medical abortion was the preferred method, and overall management was aligned with WHO guidelines. However, patient satisfaction was moderate. Improving infrastructure, ensuring privacy, reducing waiting times, enhancing post-abortion counseling, and providing tailored health education with regular service evaluations are needed to improve the quality of abortion care and patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.