Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41467112›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2026

COVID-19 vaccine trust and uptake: the role of media, interpersonal and institutional trust in a large population-based survey.

Lara E Coelho, Guilherme T Goedert, Juliano Genari, Paula M Luz, Luiz Max Carvalho, Cleber V B D Santos, Daniel Csillag, Tulio Konečný, Lucia Campos Pellanda, Claudio J Struchiner and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lara E CoelhoInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Guilherme T GoedertEscola de Matemática Aplicada, Fundação Getulio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Juliano GenariEscola de Matemática Aplicada, Fundação Getulio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Paula M LuzInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Luiz Max CarvalhoEscola de Matemática Aplicada, Fundação Getulio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Cleber V B D SantosDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States.
Daniel CsillagEscola de Matemática Aplicada, Fundação Getulio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Tulio KonečnýEscola de Matemática Aplicada, Fundação Getulio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Lucia Campos PellandaFederal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Claudio J StruchinerEscola de Matemática Aplicada, Fundação Getulio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Mariângela Freitas da SilveiraPost-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Pedro C HallalDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vaccine uptake is critical to controlling COVID-19 and other infectious diseases, and trust in vaccines is a key determinant of vaccine coverage. This study aims to examine how individual characteristics and primary information sources during the pandemic influenced COVID-19 vaccine trust and uptake. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the EPICOVID 2.0 survey, a Brazilian nationwide study (March-April 2024) that used multistage probabilistic sampling. Participants aged 18 or older from the EPICOVID 2.0 study were included in the analyses. Machine learning algorithms were employed to predict COVID-19 vaccine trust and uptake, measuring the influence of each covariate on the predicted probabilities. Findings: Among 29,281 participants (63.9% women; median age 51 years), 60% reported trusting the COVID-19 vaccine and 72% had received ≥3 doses. Uptake strongly correlated with trust: 67% of unvaccinated or unsure participants distrusted the vaccine, while trust increased with the number of doses-62.6% (3 doses), 73.8% (4 doses), and 89.8% (≥5 doses). Gen Z adults (18-30 years) were less likely to trust the vaccine (negative influence of -0.07). Positive predictors of trust included higher education and trust in television or nurses as information sources (positive influences of 0.05, 0.09 and 0.07, respectively). Interpretation: Trust and uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine were moderate, 60% and 72%, respectively. Gen Z adults reported greater distrust and lower uptake, while higher education was associated with increased trust. These findings highlight the need for tailored communication and health literacy interventions to improve vaccine uptake. Funding: Brazilian Ministry of Health.

Indexed as

CoronavirusSARS-CoV2SurveyVaccine trustVaccine uptake

Identifiers

PMID41467112
PMCPMC12744256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.