ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2026
COVID-19 vaccine trust and uptake: the role of media, interpersonal and institutional trust in a large population-based survey.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding vaccinations among LGBTQIA+ community in Italy.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vaccine uptake is critical to controlling COVID-19 and other infectious diseases, and trust in vaccines is a key determinant of vaccine coverage. This study aims to examine how individual characteristics and primary information sources during the pandemic influenced COVID-19 vaccine trust and uptake. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the EPICOVID 2.0 survey, a Brazilian nationwide study (March-April 2024) that used multistage probabilistic sampling. Participants aged 18 or older from the EPICOVID 2.0 study were included in the analyses. Machine learning algorithms were employed to predict COVID-19 vaccine trust and uptake, measuring the influence of each covariate on the predicted probabilities. Findings: Among 29,281 participants (63.9% women; median age 51 years), 60% reported trusting the COVID-19 vaccine and 72% had received ≥3 doses. Uptake strongly correlated with trust: 67% of unvaccinated or unsure participants distrusted the vaccine, while trust increased with the number of doses-62.6% (3 doses), 73.8% (4 doses), and 89.8% (≥5 doses). Gen Z adults (18-30 years) were less likely to trust the vaccine (negative influence of -0.07). Positive predictors of trust included higher education and trust in television or nurses as information sources (positive influences of 0.05, 0.09 and 0.07, respectively). Interpretation: Trust and uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine were moderate, 60% and 72%, respectively. Gen Z adults reported greater distrust and lower uptake, while higher education was associated with increased trust. These findings highlight the need for tailored communication and health literacy interventions to improve vaccine uptake. Funding: Brazilian Ministry of Health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.