ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2025
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Transarterial-Chemoembolization versus Radiofrequency-Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma within Milan Criteria: A Propensity Score-Matching Study.
Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radio-frequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the Milan criteria. Materials and Methods: 162 patients with HCC who underwent TACE (n=97) or RFA (n=65) from February 2011 to December 2024. A matched cohort composed of 88 patients was included after propensity score matching (PSM). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Results: Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups after propensity score matching. Before matching, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 71.0%, 48.7%, 34.1%, respectively, in the TACE group and 87.0%, 69.5%, 63.1%, respectively, in the RFA group (P = 0.006). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 37.1%, 25.1%, 18.3% in TACE group, and 52.6%, 43.3%, 40.6% in RFA group (P=0.009). After matching, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were81.2%, 48.1%, 37.1%, respectively, in the TACE group and 88.6%, 65.6%, and 54.6%, respectively, in the RFA group (p=0.15). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 33.3%, 20.5%, 17.5% in TACE group, and52.3%, 40.2%, 37.8% in RFA group (P=0.036). Before and after PSM, the incidence of major complications (before PSM P=0.306, after PSM P=0.08) and length of hospital stay (before PSM P=0.25, after PSM P=0.406) were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: In the treatment of HCC within the Milan criteria, RFA demonstrated a superior median PFS compared to TACE, although there was no significant difference in OS between the two therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.