Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41467086›Full record

ArticlePalliative care and social practice2025

Understanding attitudes and preferences towards advance care planning in older adults: Insights from a cross-sectional study in primary care.

Kanthee Anantapong, Pawara Na Rangsee, Thareerat Ananchaisarp

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kanthee AnantapongDivision of Psychiatry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3190-4355
Pawara Na RangseeDivision of Family and Preventive Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8275-2044
Thareerat AnanchaisarpDivision of Family and Preventive Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Advance care planning (ACP) is crucial for ensuring quality end-of-life care, yet its implementation remains limited in Thailand. Objectives: To understand the attitudes and preferences of older Thai adults towards ACP in primary care settings. Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted using structured interviews. Data on demographics, health status, attitudes, and preferences towards ACP were collected. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify factors associated with ACP attitudes and preferences. Setting/subjects: Participants aged 60 years or older at the Primary Care Unit of Songklanagarind Hospital, Thailand, between June and December 2022. Results: Among 250 participants, 60% had high comorbidity levels (Charlson Comorbidity Index >3). While most participants demonstrated high attitude levels towards ACP, over 40% did not want to make an ACP, and 37.2% wanted to postpone it. Higher educational levels (adjusted OR (aOR) = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.16-4.06) and prior ACP discussions (aOR = 4.08, 95% CI: 1.38-12.08) were significantly associated with high attitude levels. Participants with high attitude levels showed greater odds of desiring to engage in ACP (aOR = 2.81, 95% CI: 1.45-5.42). Those with higher education (aOR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.1-3.98) and family members who received life-sustaining treatment (aOR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.02-3.55) were more likely to prefer ACP engagement. Conclusion: Tailored education and repeated ACP discussions are needed to bridge the gap between attitudes and engagement among older Thai adults.

Indexed as

advance care planningageingcancerdementiaend-of-lifefrailtynoncommunicable diseasespalliative care

Identifiers

PMID41467086
PMCPMC12743807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.