ArticleLeukemia research reports2025
BCR::ABL1 kinase domain mutations and their predictive value for treatment outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with first-line imatinib in a low-income setting: Experience from Côte d'Ivoire.
Article in Leukemia research reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We aimed to analyse the incidence of BCR::ABL1 kinase domain mutations in patients newly diagnosed with or undergoing treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in Côte d'Ivoire, as well as to evaluate the predictive factors associated with treatment outcomes. Methods: We evaluated 42 patients with suboptimal molecular response who underwent BCR::ABL1 kinase domain mutation screening. Sequencing was performed in collaboration with the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA. Results: Among the 42 patients, 16 (38.1%) were found to have known BCR::ABL1 point mutations. A total of nine distinct mutations were identified, with T315I being the most common (5). Three patients harbored compound mutations: one had T315I + M244V, another had G250E + E459K, and the third had H396P + E459K. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was significantly lower in patients with BCR::ABL1 mutations (85%; 95 % CI: 51.0%-96.1%) compared to those without mutations (100%). However, there was no statistically significant difference in OS between patients with T315I mutations (83.3 %; 95 % CI: 27.4%-97.5%) and those without T315I (83.3%; 95% CI: 5.9%-98.8%). Being in the chronic phase of the disease and having a low-risk ELTS score were identified as protective factors against the development of mutations. Conclusion: Our findings support the recommendation for BCR::ABL1 mutation screening in CML patients with an inadequate initial response or evidence of loss of response. Screening is also advised at progression to the accelerated or blast phase, and in patients with high-risk ELTS scores, and mutation profiles may serve as important prognostic indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.