ReviewResuscitation plus2025
Cerebral oxygen monitoring during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A scoping review.
Review in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cerebral tissue oxygen saturation is not routinely monitored during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) but can be assessed using cerebral oxygen monitoring (COM). This non-invasive technique provides real-time measurements of brain oxygenation. The aim of this scoping review (ScR) was to map and describe published studies on the use of COM in OHCA in prehospital and emergency department (ED) settings. Methods: This review followed the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses ScR (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Peer-reviewed primary studies reporting the use of COM in OHCA patients in prehospital and/or ED settings were eligible. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to August 8th, 2025. Results: A total of 2166 records were screened, and 57 publications representing 51 studies were included. The studied populations were mainly adult males and included patients with non-traumatic causes of arrest. Most studies were small observational cohorts from Japan, conducted in the ED. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) was the predominant technology used. Studies commonly examined associations between COM values and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or neurological outcomes. Few papers evaluated COM's impact on clinical decision-making or treatment. Conclusion: The evidence base is dominated by small, ED-based observational studies with limited geographical diversity. While many publications explored the association between COM values and ROSC or neurological outcomes, few reported outcomes data or investigated COM's role in influencing treatment. Future research should focus on methodological standardization, broader international representation, and the clinical utility of COM-guided interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.