Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41467048›Full record

ReviewCurrent addiction reports2025

A Narrative Review of Research on Cannabis Advertising in the United States.

Meghan Bridgid Moran, Saraniya Tharmarajah, Lauren Czaplicki, Johannes Thrul, Tory R Spindle, Ryan Vandrey, Jennifer L Pearson, C Austin Zamarripa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current addiction reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Meghan Bridgid MoranDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6745-6668
Saraniya TharmarajahDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6186-9995
Lauren CzaplickiDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7496-0990
Johannes ThrulSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8929-9579
Tory R SpindleBehavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2859-116X
Ryan VandreyBehavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6657-884X
Jennifer L PearsonDepartment of Health Behavior, Policy, and Administration, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, NV USA.
C Austin ZamarripaBehavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6426-8984

Funding

Effects of Cannabis Species Labeling and Marketing on Perceptual, Subjective and Objective Use OutcomesR01DA059584 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Meghan Bridgid Moran, Carlos Austin Zamarripa · 2024 to 2026
$2.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA059584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: In the U.S., cannabis products containing at least 0.3% tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), are legal for adult use in 22 states (including the District of Columbia) and in 16 additional states for medicinal use. There is a growing body of literature to understand how these products are marketed. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize recent research examining cannabis advertising. We characterized the research reviewed across three primary domains: (1) content of cannabis advertising; (2) prevalence of cannabis advertising exposure; and (3) effects of cannabis advertising on user perceptions. Recent Findings: Research indicates that cannabis is marketed in a variety of ways, including via tactics (e.g., price promotions) found to be effective in increasing use of other commercial products (e.g., tobacco). Moreover, cannabis marketing tactics may be appealing to youth or mislead consumers via unsubstantiated health claims. Exposure to cannabis advertising is common among both youth and adults, occurring through a variety of pathways including storefront signage, social media and billboards. Finally, several studies have found associations between exposure to cannabis marketing and cannabis use; however, studies designed to estimate causal effects of exposure were limited, warranting additional research in this area. Summary: Understanding the prevalence and effects of exposure to cannabis advertising, along with the content of this advertising, can inform the operationalization and implementation of regulations and interventions designed to mitigate harms associated with advertising exposure.

Indexed as

CommunicationContentExposureHealth communicationMarketingPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID41467048
PMCPMC12743689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.