Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41467013›Full record

ReviewFundamental research2025

Structural reconstruction of electrocatalysts.

Chenfeng Xia, Fu-Min Li, Chaohui He, Shahid Zaman, Wei Guo, Bao Yu Xia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fundamental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chenfeng XiaSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry for Energy Conversion and Storage (Ministry of Education), Hubei Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry and Service Failure, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan 430074, China.
Fu-Min LiSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry for Energy Conversion and Storage (Ministry of Education), Hubei Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry and Service Failure, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan 430074, China.
Chaohui HeSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry for Energy Conversion and Storage (Ministry of Education), Hubei Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry and Service Failure, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan 430074, China.
Shahid ZamanSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry for Energy Conversion and Storage (Ministry of Education), Hubei Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry and Service Failure, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan 430074, China.
Wei GuoSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry for Energy Conversion and Storage (Ministry of Education), Hubei Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry and Service Failure, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan 430074, China.
Bao Yu XiaSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry for Energy Conversion and Storage (Ministry of Education), Hubei Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry and Service Failure, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan 430074, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient and durable electrocatalysts are essential for achieving high electrocatalytic efficiency in electrocatalytic reactions, forming the bedrock of effective electrochemical energy technologies. Electrocatalysis is a complex process, marked by intricate reaction system and crucial interfacial interactions, leading to diverse degrees of reconstruction changes in electrocatalysts, affecting both catalytic capabilities and structural integrity. This review delves into the development and prospects of electrocatalyst reconstruction within the electrochemical energy conversion and storage technologies. It elucidates the underlying motivation and mechanism driving reconstruction in various oxidation/reduction reaction systems. Moreover, it elucidates the evolution and comprehension of highly effective electrocatalysts that emerge as a result of this reconstruction phenomenon. The characterizations of catalyst reconstruction are thoroughly examined through the cutting-edge imaging/spectroscopy technologies, enabling dynamic reconstruction tracking and identification. Finally, this work highlights the challenges and opportunities associated with advancing reconstructed electrocatalysts. The primary objectives are to fathom the intricacies of reconstruction and its structural evolution for precise catalyst design. Additionally, it aims to regulate the reconstruction process to enhance the electrocatalyst longevity, stabilize catalytic reactions, and ultimately facilitate the implementation of electrochemical technologies.

Indexed as

CharacterizationCorrosionElectrocatalystElectrochemistryReconstruction

Identifiers

PMID41467013
PMCPMC12744674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.