ArticleFundamental research2025
Detecting dynamical causality by intersection cardinal concavity.
Article in Fundamental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Discovering causality from observed time series data is of great importance in various disciplines but also a challenging task. In recent years, cross-mapping methods have been developed to solve the non-separability or false-negative problem that traditional methods, e.g., Granger causality or transfer entropy, cannot handle. However, these cross-mapping methods suffer still from nonlinearity and robustness problems on the noisy data. Here, we propose cross-mapping cardinality (CMC), which detects direct causality in a robust and nonlinear manner by quantifying the intersectional cardinality (IC) from the neighbors of the cause variable to the cross-mapping neighbors of the effect variable in the delay embedding space. We theoretically and computationally show the new causal concept "IC concavity", i.e. concave IC curve against the neighbor size implies causality in the sense of dynamical causality, in contrast to the non-causality of linear IC curve. Thus, the causal strength is measured reliably by the IC curve, which exploits both IC continuity and information transfer of the cross-mapping function from effect to cause variables. Through verification on various simulated and real-world datasets, the accuracy and robustness of CMC are demonstrated significantly better than existing methods. In particular, we validated CMC with the pulse data from motor cortex neurons by training a rhesus monkey to conduct a flexible manual interception experiment. CMC effectively identified the causal relations between neurons while the traditional methods failed. In summary, our approach with the new concept of IC concavity provides a powerful data-driven tool for detecting dynamical causality in complex systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.