Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41466998›Full record

ArticleFundamental research2025

Detecting dynamical causality by intersection cardinal concavity.

Peng Tao, Qifan Wang, Jifan Shi, Xiaohu Hao, Xiaoping Liu, Bin Min, Yiheng Zhang, Chenyang Li, He Cui, Luonan Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fundamental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Peng TaoKey Laboratory of Systems Health Science of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Science, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310024, China.
Qifan WangCenter for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligent Technology, Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.
Jifan ShiResearch Institute of Intelligent Complex Systems, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Xiaohu HaoKey Laboratory of Systems Biology, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.
Xiaoping LiuKey Laboratory of Systems Health Science of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Science, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310024, China.
Bin MinShanghai Center for Brain Science and Brain-inspired Technology, Shanghai 200031, China.
Yiheng ZhangCenter for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligent Technology, Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.
Chenyang LiCenter for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligent Technology, Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.
He CuiCenter for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligent Technology, Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.
Luonan ChenKey Laboratory of Systems Health Science of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Science, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310024, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovering causality from observed time series data is of great importance in various disciplines but also a challenging task. In recent years, cross-mapping methods have been developed to solve the non-separability or false-negative problem that traditional methods, e.g., Granger causality or transfer entropy, cannot handle. However, these cross-mapping methods suffer still from nonlinearity and robustness problems on the noisy data. Here, we propose cross-mapping cardinality (CMC), which detects direct causality in a robust and nonlinear manner by quantifying the intersectional cardinality (IC) from the neighbors of the cause variable to the cross-mapping neighbors of the effect variable in the delay embedding space. We theoretically and computationally show the new causal concept "IC concavity", i.e. concave IC curve against the neighbor size implies causality in the sense of dynamical causality, in contrast to the non-causality of linear IC curve. Thus, the causal strength is measured reliably by the IC curve, which exploits both IC continuity and information transfer of the cross-mapping function from effect to cause variables. Through verification on various simulated and real-world datasets, the accuracy and robustness of CMC are demonstrated significantly better than existing methods. In particular, we validated CMC with the pulse data from motor cortex neurons by training a rhesus monkey to conduct a flexible manual interception experiment. CMC effectively identified the causal relations between neurons while the traditional methods failed. In summary, our approach with the new concept of IC concavity provides a powerful data-driven tool for detecting dynamical causality in complex systems.

Indexed as

Causal inferenceCross mappingDynamical causalityFalse-negative problemNonlinear causalityNon-separability problem

Identifiers

PMID41466998
PMCPMC12744533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.