Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41466997›Full record

ArticleFundamental research2025

Can competitive effects and responses of alien and native species predict invasion outcomes?

Tingting Wu, Yuanzhi Li, Marc W Cadotte, Oscar Godoy, Chengjin Chu

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Fundamental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tingting WuState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.
Yuanzhi LiState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Ecology, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China.
Marc W CadotteDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto-Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, ON M1C 1A4, Canada.
Oscar GodoyDepartamento de Biología, Instituto Universitario de Ciencias del Mar (INMAR), Universidad de Cádiz, E-11510 Puerto Real, Spain.
Chengjin ChuState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relative competitive ability of native and alien species, which consists of competitive effect (CE) and response (CR), has often been invoked as a key determinant of invasion success. Previous studies have reported that an alien species with a high CE and/or a low CR would successfully invade a native species. However, no studies have yet empirically examined the hypothesis or tested the consistency of invasion outcomes predicted by the CE-CR framework and modern species coexistence theory (MCT). To fill this research gap, we conducted a pairwise competition experiment between five alien and five native species, quantified CE and CR based on their biomass in the absence and presence of

Indexed as

Competitive effectsCompetitive responsesInvasion outcomesModern coexistence theoryPlant invasionRicker model

Identifiers

PMID41466997
PMCPMC12744614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.