Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41466979›Full record

ReviewFundamental research2025

Cryotherapy and thermotherapy in the management of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: A comprehensive review.

Yuming Yao, Wenqing Xie, Michael Opoku, Djandan Tadum Arthur Vithran, Zhou Li, Yusheng Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fundamental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Gouty arthritis and cryotherapy in a manual practitioner: an imaging case review.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Physical biomedical science.Fundamental research · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Recent advances in injectable hydrogels for osteoarthritis treatments.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuming YaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
Wenqing XieDepartment of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
Michael OpokuDepartment of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
Djandan Tadum Arthur VithranDepartment of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
Zhou LiBeijing Institute of Nanoenergy and Nanosystems, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101400, China.
Yusheng LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As non-pharmacological options for osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), cold and heat therapies manipulate local temperatures to improve symptoms and promote functional recovery. Cryotherapy reduces acute pain and inflammation by lowering temperatures, while thermotherapy elevates body temperature to enhance blood circulation and tissue repair. Contrast therapy combines the benefits of cold and heat treatments, alternating between them to boost blood flow and relieve pain. This review analyzes the existing literature, highlighting the potential benefits of these treatments in alleviating symptoms of patients with OA and RA, while emphasizing the importance of developing personalized treatment plans in clinical practice. Although specific recommendations for the application of cold and heat therapies vary across major clinical guidelines, their cautious use tailored to individual patient circumstances is generally considered beneficial. Further, with the emergence of new cold and heat therapy devices and materials, such as wearable devices and applications of nanotechnology, more possibilities for physical therapy in arthritis are available now. These innovative technologies are expected to enhance the precision, safety, and convenience of treatments. However, current research on cold and heat therapies still has limitations, including small sample sizes and a lack of long-term follow-up data. Future research needs to further validate the efficacy and safety of these treatment methods through large-scale, high-quality clinical trials, and probe their role in the comprehensive management of OA and RA.

Indexed as

Contrast therapyCryotherapyOsteoarthritisRheumatoid arthritisThermotherapy

Identifiers

PMID41466979
PMCPMC12744633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.