ReviewCureus2025
Revolutionizing Pediatric Endodontics: A Two-Decade Narrative on the Evolution, Efficiency, and Future of Pediatric Rotary Systems.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Evaluation of Single-Visit Post-endodontic Discomfort Using Three Different Rotary File Systems: An In Vivo Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Efficiency and obturation quality of Kedo-S rotary files versus hand files in pediatric endodontics.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preservation of primary teeth plays a vital role in maintaining arch integrity and guiding the eruption of permanent successors. Pulpectomy remains the treatment of choice for retaining non-vital primary teeth; however, traditional manual instrumentation is often time-consuming and technically demanding because of the complex and resorbing root morphology. Over the past decades, the advent of pediatric-specific nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary systems has revolutionized endodontic practice in children by offering enhanced precision, safety, and efficiency. This narrative review synthesizes the developmental trajectory, design innovations, metallurgical advancements, and clinical performance of rotary file systems specifically designed for primary teeth. The literature, drawn from major databases spanning 2000-2025, highlights the transformation from modified adult files to pediatric-optimized systems, such as Kedo-S (Kedo Dental, Chennai, India), Kedo-SG Blue (Kedo Dental), Pro AF Baby Gold (Dentobizz, Yavatmal, India), and Fanta AF™ (Fanta Dental Materials, Shanghai, China), which integrate shorter lengths, variable tapers, and heat-treated or nano-coated NiTi alloys. These systems have demonstrated superior canal shaping, reduced instrumentation time, improved obturation quality, and greater patient cooperation than conventional hand files. Advancements in metallurgy, including controlled memory, gold and blue heat treatments, and nanocoating, have markedly improved file flexibility, fatigue resistance, and cutting control. However, challenges regarding technique sensitivity, cost, and training requirements persist. This review underscores the importance of adhering to precise torque and speed parameters, ensuring correct working length determination, and maintaining irrigation safety to avoid procedural mishaps. Emerging trends, such as artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted imaging, nanotechnology-driven coatings, reciprocating motion systems, and 3D-printed simulation training, promise to further refine future pediatric rotary endodontics. Collectively, these innovations represent a shift toward safer, faster, and more predictable pulpectomy outcomes. Rotary instrumentation has evolved from the adaptation of adult techniques to a specialized, evidence-based cornerstone of contemporary pediatric dental care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.