ArticleCureus2025
Immunosuppression Masking a Urological Emergency: A Case Report of Bilateral Infected Obstructed Kidneys.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An infected obstructed kidney is a urological emergency with the potential to cause life-threatening sepsis. It is often due to ureteric calculi and requires urgent decompression by ureteric stent or percutaneous nephrostomy. We present a patient who presented with bilateral obstructed kidneys secondary to ureteric stones while on immunosuppressive therapy. A middle‑aged woman with prior bilateral lung transplants on tacrolimus and prednisolone presented with acute abdominal pain, fever, tachycardia, and hypotension. Clinical examination was unremarkable, and blood tests showed normal inflammatory markers and renal function. CT imaging revealed a 6 mm right distal ureteric calculus and a 4 mm left vesicoureteric junction calculus with subtle obstructive features. Despite atypical findings, urological intervention was pursued, given ongoing sepsis and absence of alternative pathology. The patient underwent bilateral ureteric stenting and was admitted to intensive care, recovered well, and was discharged. Elective ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy achieved stone clearance six weeks later, with no recurrence at six‑month follow‑up. She has been discharged from urology follow-up. The case underscores the challenges in diagnosis and management of immunosuppressed patients, where atypical clinical presentations may cause diagnostic uncertainties. Multidisciplinary coordination is essential to achieve optimal outcomes in such complex scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.