ReviewCureus2025
Subhepatic Appendicitis: A Systematic Review of Clinical Presentation, Diagnostic Challenges, and Surgical Management.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subhepatic appendicitis (SHA) is a rare positional variant of appendicitis that frequently mimics hepatobiliary disease, leading to diagnostic confusion and delay. As published evidence is limited to case reports and small series, this systematic review aims to synthesize the clinical presentation, diagnostic pathways, management, and outcomes of reported SHA cases. Following an International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)-registered protocol, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched up to 6 May 2024, with additional eligible reports identified through manual searching and citation chaining. The data extracted were summarized descriptively, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Eighty-eight publications (78 case reports, 10 series) describing 97 patients were included. The median age was 29 years, and most patients were adults (71%) and male (69%). Right hypochondriac pain was the predominant symptom (82%), often accompanied by vomiting and fever. Ultrasound identified SHA in roughly one-quarter of cases, whereas CT did so reliably in most cases (81%), improving diagnostic certainty. Nearly all patients underwent surgery, with laparoscopy attempted in about half and occasional conversion to open appendectomy. Intraoperative findings commonly included adhesions, perforation, or abscess. Outcomes were generally favorable, with only a single death reported. A subset of cases demonstrated congenital anomalies such as an undescended cecum, short ascending colon, or malrotation, accounting for the aberrant appendiceal positioning. Clinicians should consider SHA in patients with right hypochondriac pain and inconclusive hepatobiliary investigations. CT improves detection, and timely operative management, often laparoscopic, leads to favorable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.