ArticleCureus2025
Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection and Subtype Classification on CT Imaging Using a Large Language Model.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAccurate detection of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and its subtypes on CT scans is critical for timely treatment. While convolutional neural networks have achieved high diagnostic accuracy in this task, the ability of large language models (LLMs) to perform direct medical image interpretation remains largely untested.
methodsWe evaluated a general-purpose multimodal LLM for binary ICH detection and multi-class subtype classification using the publicly available PhysioNet ICH dataset (version 1.3.1, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA). Preprocessed axial slices were grouped into composite images and encoded in base64 for model input. Binary classification distinguished hemorrhage presence versus absence in 75 scans (36 positive, 39 negative). Subtype classification among positive cases included intraventricular, intraparenchymal, subarachnoid, epidural, and subdural hemorrhages. Performance metrics included accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, exact match accuracy, and Hamming score.
resultsFor binary detection, the model achieved an overall accuracy of 0.52, with low recall for hemorrhage-positive cases (0.14) and higher recall for hemorrhage-negative cases (0.87). Subtype performance varied: intraparenchymal hemorrhage reached the highest F1 score (0.57), while epidural hemorrhage showed perfect precision but poor recall (0.14). Exact match accuracy was 0.06, and the Hamming score was 0.54, reflecting partial but inconsistent predictive ability.
conclusionsThe LLM demonstrated limited sensitivity for hemorrhage detection and inconsistent subtype classification, underscoring current constraints of zero-shot application to medical imaging. These findings highlight the need for domain-specific fine-tuning, larger and more diverse datasets, and integration with traditional computer vision methods before clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.